No 2136 Posted by fw, January 5, 2018
“Scientists are making progress in better understanding how much natural seasonal patterns, ocean cycles, and other factors play a role in altering the jet stream and how much global warming is responsible. Some say a lot, others not as much. This is a robust scientific discussion that has continued to evolve over the past several years. One thing is certain: no climate scientists say there is zero contribution from global warming. We agree on 90 percent of the facts of the issue—now we’re debating the remaining 10 percent. How will we know when this particular scientific debate is over? One way or another, the scientific community will reach consensus—just as it has with climate change more broadly.” — Brenda Ekwurzel, Union of Concerned Scientists
Four years ago this month I posted a story titled, If global warming is real, how come it’s been so brutally cold across North America? As I wrote at the time, “The question is based on popular misconceptions of how cold weather moves across the planet.”
The misconceptions persist. Perhaps the persistence can be attributed to three factors: the election of “Climate-Denier-in-Chief” Donald Trump; the general public’s scientific illiteracy; and TV mainstream media’s penchant for live-streaming extreme weather disasters, while explaining nothing about their cause.
Scientists are making progress in better understanding how much natural seasonal patterns, ocean cycles, and other factors play a role in altering the jet stream and how much global warming is responsible.
Brenda Ekwurzel is a senior climate scientist and the director of climate science at UCS. Below is a repost of her article along with my added subheadings and highlighted text. Alternatively, to read her piece on the Concerned Scientists’ website, click on the following linked title.
But first, two definitions: polar vortex is a persistent, large scale, low pressure zone cyclone that rotates counter-clockwise at the North Pole — jet streams are narrow, meandering bands of fast-flowing air currents in the earth’s atmosphere. Of late, the “fast-flowing” jet stream has been slowing down.
‘Polar vortex’? ‘Nor’easter bomb’?, ‘bombogenesis’? – What do they mean?
Forecasters are trotting out “polar vortex” and atypical terms like “Nor’easter bomb” and “bombogenesis.” These words signal the unusual and dangerous conditions forecast for winter storm Grayson and their implications for the southeast US, mid-Atlantic, and eventually New England and beyond. What do they mean?
‘Winter storm Grayson’ refers to North Atlantic cyclones that draw moisture from the ocean, bringing landfall blizzards to eastern US and Canada
Meteorologists use the phrase bombogenesis to describe a sudden and extreme drop in barometric pressure of at least 24 millibars over 24 hours, which leads to rapid intensification of a mid-latitude cyclone. We are used to hearing about North Atlantic cyclones during summer and fall—its the meteorological term for hurricanes—and now winter storm Grayson is drawing moisture from a similar cyclonic circulation that will bring blizzard conditions as it moves northeast just offshore of the US east coast.
Winter weather and global warming
One again, if “global warming” is real, why the extreme winter weather in vast parts of North America
With cold temperatures and icy conditions leaving the continental US reeling over the New Year, it might seem counter-intuitive to say that we’re still experiencing global warming. But as my colleague Peter Frumhoff puts it, saying that climate change isn’t occurring because of the cold in the eastern US is “like saying if everyone around me is wealthy then poverty is not a problem…local weather is not an indicator of changes in climate.”
Global warming is ‘CLIMATE’ at a ‘GLOBAL’ level – Extreme cold is ‘WEATHER’ at a ‘LOCAL’ level
Global warming is exactly that: global. The total area of the US, including Alaska and Hawaii, is only about 2 percent of the surface area of Earth. This map from the University of Maine Climate Change Institute showing the deviations from average temperature for this time of year demonstrates this concept well—much of the continental US may be unusually cold right now but most of the rest of the world is well above average (Figure 1).
A relatively ‘balmy’ Alaska and Yukon, occurring along with a relatively ‘freezing’ Florida, come with “more events at the extremes” in a changing global climate
Alaska has been unusually warm this winter even though it is in the Arctic. It might seem strange that local weather events such as a balmy Alaska and freezing Florida can occur at the same time, but they’re examples of another phenomenon we can expect from a changing climate: more events at the extremes. Many scientists are studying these clues to explore the connections between a rapidly warming Arctic from climate change and shifting extreme weather patterns in northern hemisphere mid-latitudes (i.e. the continental US and Eurasia).
Arctic cold outbursts reach the southern US
It’s the “jet stream”, stupid: An unusual winter pattern in the jet stream is changing
Scientists noticed an unusual winter pattern in the jet stream that started around the year 2000. Before that time the jet stream was typically fast with small waves that kept the cold air contained in the Arctic region. However, the jet stream began slowing down, and its waves meandering more.
The distance between the peak (like the green and yellow band peaking near the intersection of the borders between Alaska and the Yukon Territory of Canada in Figure 2) and the trough (the highlighted red, yellow, and green area near the southern US) has become much longer since the 2000s when compared to prior decades.
Figure 2: The jet stream and polar vortex on January 3, 2017. Map from the University of Maine Climate Change Institute.
Scientific process and progress in understanding extreme weather
Our understanding of the impact of global warming on changing jet stream patterns is improving
Scientists are making progress in better understanding how much natural seasonal patterns, ocean cycles, and other factors play a role in altering the jet stream and how much global warming is responsible. Some say a lot, others not as much. This is a robust scientific discussion that has continued to evolve over the past several years.
No climate scientist is saying that global warming has no effect on extreme winter weather
One thing is certain: no climate scientists say there is zero contribution from global warming. We agree on 90 percent of the facts of the issue—now we’re debating the remaining 10 percent.
The scientific community will eventually reach a consensus on the ongoing jet stream debate
How will we know when this particular scientific debate is over? One way or another, the scientific community will reach consensus—just as it has with climate change more broadly.
When consensus is reached, the findings will be incorporated into longer-term winter forecasts
Assessments will shift toward keeping track of the changing percentage of contribution from climate change to the altered jet stream. And we’ll really know consensus is reached when this research is incorporated into longer-term outlooks for winter forecasts. In fact, a recent publication suggests that if the Arctic indicators—such as the strength or weakness of the polar vortex—were better incorporated into current winter forecasts, we could have two- to six-week previews of the winter temperatures in the northern hemisphere just like we get our 10-day forecast today.
Reliable forecasts based on scientific research will enable communities to take measures to protect people from extreme winter weather events
If predictions become reliable enough, this could help cities and counties plan to distribute snow removal equipment to regions that will need it well in advance of storms. This knowledge may better protect people facing risks to their daily lives from the consequences of extreme cold winter storm events.
FAIR USE NOTICE – For details click here