Citizen Action Monitor

UK Terror Attacks — Allegations emerge that Islamist groups allowed free movement in UK

Authorities were informed in advance of attacker’s “extremist views”, “but nothing was done.”

No 1973 Posted by fw, June 5, 2017

“Just two weeks ago, suicide bomber Salman Abedi killed 22 people, including children, who had been attending an Ariana Grande concert in Manchester. As soon emerged, Abedi and his family were well known to MI5 and the government, which had used them, along with many other Islamists, in its regime-change operations in Libya and Syria. Over the weekend, the New York Times reported that Abedi had travelled to Libya to meet with members of the Islamic State unit responsible for the November 2015 terror attack in Paris. Why he was allowed to return to the UK after this remains unexplained.”Robert Stevens and Chris Marsden, WSWS

Stevens and Marsden further maintain that Conservative Prime Minister Theresa May: is using the terror attacks to reverse her sinking opinion poll numbers prior to the upcoming election; has blocked release of an investigation into foreign funding of Middle East terrorist groups, which may incriminate the UK; and insists on “stepping up” the assault on democratic rights that has accompanied the “war on terror”.

Meanwhile, Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn has sought “to reassure the state of his loyal support.”

Below is a repost of the WSWS article, including my added subheadings, highlighted text, and a link to an external source. To read the piece on the World Socialist Web Site, click on the following linked title.

**********

Official account of London terror attack unravels by Robert Stevens and Chris Marsden, World Socialist Web Site, June 5, 2017

Authorities were informed in advance of “extremist views” of London terror attacker, “but nothing was done”

Within 24 hours of Saturday’s terror attack at London Bridge, the official narrative presented by British Prime Minister Theresa May has begun to fall apart. Speaking at Downing Street Sunday morning, May declared, “In terms of their planning and execution,” the attack in London and the May 22 attack in Manchester “are not connected.” However, after police carried out a raid at the home of one of the attackers, a neighbour told the BBC that he had informed the authorities about the man’s Islamic extremist views, but nothing was done. “I did my bit,” he said. “I know a lot of people did, but the authorities did not do their bit.”

London terror attack followed same script as Manchester bombing

The London terror attack is following the same script as the Manchester bombing as well as countless other high-profile terror incidents throughout Europe, in which the attacks were carried out by people who had been known to the police. In many instances, warnings had been made about the perpetrators.

Manchester suicide bomber was well-known to MI5 and government

Just two weeks ago, suicide bomber Salman Abedi killed 22 people, including children, who had been attending an Ariana Grande concert in Manchester.

MI5 had used suicide bomber and his family in its regime-change operations in Libya and Syria

As soon emerged, Abedi and his family were well known to MI5 and the government, which had used them, along with many other Islamists, in its regime-change operations in Libya and Syria.

Why was Abedi allowed to return to the UK after visit to Libya to meet with Islamic State members?

Over the weekend, the New York Times reported that Abedi had travelled to Libya to meet with members of the Islamic State unit responsible for the November 2015 terror attack in Paris. Why he was allowed to return to the UK after this remains unexplained.

May is using terror attacks in effort to reverse her sinking opinion poll numbers prior to election

May has seized on the terror attacks in a desperate effort to reverse the steep fall in her opinion poll ratings ahead of the June 8 general election. With the latest polls showing the Tories with a mere one percent lead, there is widespread speculation of the Tories returning with a reduced majority, a hung parliament or even a Labour victory. With its social policies reviled by millions, the government is anxious to make the election a verdict on Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn’s supposed “softness” on terrorism and unreliability when it comes to national security.

May used her Sunday statement to make various pledges of what a Conservative government would do, despite an agreement with Labour to suspend political campaigning. While insisting that preventing terror attacks meant “taking military action to destroy ISIS in Iraq and Syria,” she stressed that Islamist terrorism “cannot be defeated by military intervention alone,” or by “the maintenance of a permanent defensive counterterrorism operation, however skilful its leaders and practitioners.”

British intelligence agencies have allowed free movement to Islamist groups in the UK

The “leaders and practitioners” to which she refers, MI5 and MI6, are deeply involved in the closest of relations with Islamist groups, which they are even now wielding as proxy forces in regime-change operations in Libya and Syria. The British intelligence agencies allow members of these groups the free movement required to conduct terror attacks in the UK.

May has blocked release of report into foreign funding of Middle East terrorist groups, which may incriminate the UK

Britain also has close relations with Middle East despots who have for years backed and funded terrorist groups. Only days ago it emerged that May’s government is blocking the publication of an investigation into foreign funding of jihadi groups, authorised 18 months ago by her predecessor David Cameron, because of the “very sensitive” information it contains about Saudi Arabia, which accounts for 83 percent of UK arms exports. In April, May visited Riyadh to secure further deals.

May wants to “deepen surveillance on online activity” and “censor the Internet”

May’s speech centred on her insistence that the assault on democratic rights that has accompanied the “war on terror” must now be stepped up. She outlined plans to deepen surveillance of the online activity of the UK population and censor the Internet, describing it as a “safe space” for terrorists. But, she continued, “We must not forget about the safe spaces that continue to exist in the real world.” What was required was “stamping it out across the public sector and across society.”

Other repressive measures call for monitoring students, and authorities to act as “state informers”

This is a threat to deepen the repressive measures associated with the Prevent Strategy, including the monitoring of pupils and students and an instruction that all those in positions of authority act as state informers.

New “counterterrorism strategy” would make sure police and security services have all needed powers

May concluded with the claim that the vast array of repressive powers granted to the state security services and the police are still not enough. A “counterterrorism strategy” would be enacted “to make sure the police and security services have all the powers they need.”

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn “accepted May’s official narrative almost in its entirety”

In his response yesterday evening, Corbyn made clear that the working class cannot look to Labour to provide an alternative to May’s agenda of increased state repression and war. He made no attempt to warn the working class as to the dangers posed. Instead, he again accepted May’s official narrative almost in its entirety and focused his criticism on the government not having done enough to successfully wage the war on terror.

Corbyn has sought “to reassure the state of his loyal support”

As he has done already by abandoning his opposition to NATO and accepting the Trident nuclear weapons programme, Corbyn sought to reassure the state of his loyal support. “You cannot protect the public on the cheap,” he said, insisting that “The police and security services must get the resources they need, not 20,000 police cuts” as had happened under the Conservatives.

Abandoning his previous opposition to the shoot-to-kill policy first revealed after the fatal shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes, in the aftermath of the July 7, 2005 London bombings, Corbyn said the police should be free to take “whatever action is necessary and effective… That includes full authority for the police to use whatever force is necessary to protect and save life as they did last night, as they did in Westminster in March.”

SEE ALSO

The Manchester Bombing as Blowback: The Latest Evidence by Mark Curtis and Nafeez Ahmed, Information Clearinghouse, June 3, 2017 — The evidence suggests that the barbaric Manchester bombing, which killed 22 innocent people on May 22nd, is a case of blowback on British citizens arising at least partly from the overt and covert actions of British governments. The British state therefore has a serious case to answer. We focus primarily here on UK policies towards Libya but also touch on some of those related to Iraq and Syria.

What Theresa May Refused to Tell You In Her Sermon On Terror by Robert Fisk, Information Clearinghouse, June 4, 2017 — Was that really the best Theresa May could do? It was the same old tosh about “values” and “democracy” and “evil ideology”, without the slightest reference to the nation to whom she fawns – Saudi Arabia, whose Wahhabist “ideology” has seeped into the bloodstream of Isis, al-Qaeda and the Taliban.

‘Blame The Internet’ Is Just Not A Good Enough Response, Theresa May by Charles Arthur, Information Clearinghouse, June 4, 2017 — After London Bridge the prime minister has wheeled out the usual scapegoat, and demanded controls on cyberspace – but that would open a Pandora’s box.

FAIR USE NOTICE – For details click here

Advertisements

Information

This entry was posted on June 5, 2017 by in evidence based counterpower, information counterpower, political action and tagged , , .
%d bloggers like this: