No 1902 Posted by fw, March 2, 2017
“The bulk of the address was just a rehash of all his promises and his programs to, “Make America great again”. And he’s really running out of time, because he said it last year. He said it last fall. He said it after the election. He said it after the inauguration. And apart from a bunch of Executive Orders, many of which were just exhortations, not much has happened…. But what was interesting was the bookends. I mean, he started and ended with extreme declarations of dreams for America, of compassion, of peace, of an ideal world that he has not articulated before. So, I think what he was doing, is he was trying to appeal to a unified population, supported by the most orchestrated, consistent, and prolonged applause, that I’ve heard in a long time…. That applause was not spontaneous. It was deliberate. It was timed.” Ralph Nader, The Real News Network
According to a CNN report, 7-in-10 speech-watchers say Trump boosted optimism: Viewers said “the President’s proposed policies would move the country in the right direction and almost two-thirds said the president has the right priorities for the country.”
Hmm. Could this report be an example of confirmation bias among Trump’s CNN-viewing supporters?
The politically astute Ralph Nader was considerably more critical of President Trump than CNN’s speech-watchers. To illustrate how selective Trump was in the “facts” he chose to share / not share with Congress and the viewing audience in the US and beyond, here’s a summary of some of the critical points Nader raised in his 20-minute interview on the Real News Network:
Examples of the significant benefits of regulatory agencies, which Trump promises to cut:
Here are some other things Nader caught that Trump omitted:
Trump made his usual factual errors in his speech, including, for example, on crime rates and corporate tax rates
Welcome to Trump’s New Reality Show in which our Liar-in-Chief finds countless ways to “bigly” increase his personal wealth at taxpayer’s expense.
Below is a repost of Nader’s interview, including an embedded video, a slightly modified transcript, added subheadings, highlighted text and new hyperlinks. At the bottom of the post is a link to a transcript of Trump’s speech with revelatory added fact-checking annotations by Vox news staff.
Alternatively, click on the following linked title to watch the interview and access the full transcript.
Paul Jay — Welcome to The Real News Network. I’m Paul Jay in Baltimore. President Trump spoke to Congress and to the Nation, and I guess to the world on Tuesday night from Congress. Here’s a little clip of some of what he had to say.
Donald Trump — We have undertaken a historic effort, to massively reduce job-crushing regulations, creating a de-regulation task force inside of every government agency. And we’re imposing a new rule, which mandates that for every one new regulation, two old regulations must be eliminated. And to stop the regulations that threaten the future and livelihood of our great coal miners.
Trump will use money from cuts in regulatory agencies to increase military budget
Jay — In the speech, President Trump perhaps, didn’t put as much emphasis on the issue of deregulation, as in the days leading up to this speech.
At the CPAC conference, both President Trump and his Senior Advisor Steve Bannon, made their central points — as Bannon put it — to deconstruct the administrative state, to get rid of regulations. And then, a couple of days after CPAC, President Trump announced a $54 billion increase in the military budget.
And where’s that money coming from? Well, from those regulatory agencies, and from social programs. Not Medicare, not Social Security, but other federally funded social programs. But most importantly, again, an attack on what they call the regulatory agencies, regulatory environment. In the speech, one direct reference to this by Trump was on the FDA.
Trump Lie – It’s not FDA regulations that slows drug innovation, it’s the limits of our knowledge
Trump — But our slow and burdensome approval process, at the Food and Drug Administration, keeps too many advances, like the one that saved Megan’s life, from reaching those in need. If we slash the restraints, not just at the FDA, but across our government, then we will be blessed with far more miracles, just like Megan.
Jay — But gutting the FDA, or speeding up the approval process. Gutting the EPA? Well, if there’s one man that’s more associated with the creation of these agencies than our guest, I don’t think there is, in fact, he is the most associated.
And joining us now from Washington, D.C., is Ralph Nader. Ralph is a renowned political activist, attorney, auto safety reformer, consumer advocate, and former Green Party Presidential candidate.
He’s the author of, Breaking Through Power: It’s Easier Than We Think. He was instrumental in the creation of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Consumer Product Safety Commission, and the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration.
Ralph has founded dozens of citizens’ groups, focused on corporate and government accountability, including the Center for Study of Responsive Law in Washington, and Public Citizen. And Ralph joins us by phone.
So, first of all, [give us] your initial, overall impression of the address?
The speech was just “a rehash of all his promises and his programs to, ‘Make America great again’”
Ralph Nader — The bulk of the address was just a rehash of all his promises and his programs to, “Make America great again”. And he’s really running out of time, because he said it last year. He said it last fall. He said it after the election. He said it after the inauguration. And apart from a bunch of Executive Orders, many of which were just exhortations, not much has happened.
The frequent, prolonged applause was not spontaneous, it was orchestrated
But what was interesting was the bookends. I mean, he started and ended with extreme declarations of dreams for America, of compassion, of peace, of an ideal world that he has not articulated before. So, I think what he was doing, is he was trying to appeal to a unified population, supported by the most orchestrated, consistent, and prolonged applause, that I’ve heard in a long time, in Presidential addresses. That applause was not spontaneous. It was deliberate. It was timed. And there’s no greater example of that than his valiant attempt to exonerate the failed raid in Iran, that took the life of a Seal, — plus the lives of innocent men, women and children in Yemen — that the Pentagon has admitted to causing their death.
Going forward, Trump’s easily bruised ego will require “a kind of reality TV exoneration”
And you can see how his easily bruised ego is going to play out in the coming months; that disasters, losses, failures, blunders, are all going to be painted over, with a kind of reality TV exoneration.
Trump played up the presence of the wife of the US soldier killed in Yemen, no mention of father’s protest
Jay — I guess the death of that soldier in Yemen is a particular sore point, because the father of the solider, if I understand it correctly, had refused to meet with Trump and called for an investigation. So, I guess they figured it somewhat of a coup to have gotten the soldier’s wife to come.
Nader — That’s right. And there’s no mention of the strong protest of the father, who is a former military man, basically challenging Trump on this, and demanding an independent investigation. But the other thing is, it was a kind of Trump-utopia* — that covered up a lot of bad things.
[*Re Trump-utopia – As an aside, although the transcript spelled this as ‘Trump-utopia’ Nader’s pronunciation sounds to me more like Trumpatopia. ‘Trumpatopia’ is not explained by Jay or Nader or by any dictionary I checked. There is an entry in the Urban Dictionary for ‘Trumptopia’ but that is not what I hear Nader saying. Perhaps he mis-spoke because Trumptopia means “A form of government characterized by an emphasis on anti-intellectualism, misogyny, and racism. It is also void of truth, tact, morals, consistency, and acceptance. Although this type of government may appeal to a certain number of citizens, they are often void of care, thought, individualism, intelligence, respect, and truth.“
With a Trump presidency, the House Judiciary Ctte. has passed 6 laws against the rights of wrongfully injured citizens
For example, the House Judiciary Committee’s passing out, without any public hearings, six terrible laws against the rights of wrongfully injured Americans. To go to court under the Law of Torts, to have their day in court with a full trial by jury, to be able to join class actions against Toyota, or Takata, or VW, or GM-type defects.
Trump wants to repeal the legal legacy of part of the American Revolution
And then of course, here he is talking about the legacy of our great country, and he’s repealing, he wants to repeal, part of the American Revolution, which stressed emphatically, against King George, III, the full use of the courts by the people at that time, and trial by jury of their peers.
Fork-tongued Trump talks about a cleaner environment while preparing massive cuts to the EPA
The other thing is he, you know, he talks with a forked-tongue, of course. We’re going to have cleaner water. We’re going to have cleaner air, he said. At the same time, he’s preparing a massive cut, in the already debilitated budget for the Environmental Protection Administration.
He plans to take money from regulatory agencies to gift $650 billion to the military
Along with many other life-saving regulatory agencies, whose total budget, and you know, hardly amounts to a couple percent of the Pentagon budget. You take the FDA, the Auto Safety Agency, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the Federal Railroad Administration, the EPA, Consumer Product Safety Commission, I mean, they all amount to a few billion dollars — compared to the $650 billion Pentagon budget, which includes the appropriations for the war against Iraq–
Jay — Ralph, to some extent, people that aren’t that familiar with these agencies, it sounds a bit like alphabet soup. Can you give some examples of what they do, and how it might affect people’s lives if they’re weakened?
[Examples of Signifiant Benefits of Regulatory Agencies Targetted for Funding Cuts]
The Food and Drug Administration blocked use of thalidomide by pregnant women
Nader — Yeah, well you know, thousands of babies are born with flippers for legs and arms in Europe, because they didn’t have regulation of a sedative, years ago, that was taken by pregnant women. Well, our Food and Drug Administration under the leadership of Dr. Kelsey blocked it. And so, there were no babies born with flippers for legs because–
Jay — This is thalidomide, is it?
Nader — Yeah, that was thalidomide.
Auto Safety Agency has presided over a massive decline in road fatalities beginning in 1966
The Auto Safety Agency, has presided with some irregular interruptions, with a massive decline in fatalities and injuries on the road. The curve has gone up in the last two years. But according to Clarence Detlow, of the Center for Auto Safety, 3.5 million deaths were averted because of the federal role that started in 1966, under Linden Johnson, in highway vehicle and driver Safety — 3.5 million-averted deaths. And you can imagine how many more injuries were averted.
Americans have less lead in their blood and more fuel efficient vehicles thanks to EPA regulations
The American people have less lead in their blood because Tetraethyllead was taken off the market from gasoline, by the Environmental Protection Agency. We have more efficient motor vehicles, in terms of gas mileage, nothing like I would have liked, but still, that has saved billions and billions of dollars.
The Consumer Financial Protection Board cracked down on financial fraud
We have the Consumer Financial Protection Board, that the Republicans and Trump seem to want to abolish, that has brought back $11.5 billion. And is cracking down on financial fraud against students with loans, fraud against mortgage shenanigans, and other such corporate violations. And the story goes on and on.
Trump’s cuts to regulatory agencies will further bloat the unaccountable, mismanaged Pentagon that loses billions
Now, none of these federal regulatory agencies besieged by corporate lobbyists, and often run by people from the corporations they’re supposed to regulate, have done what I would like done. But can you imagine life without them? And those are the budgets he wants to cut so he can continue bloating the Pentagon budget, which is the only agency in the country at the federal level that is not auditable. It is violating a 1990 federal law that went into effect in 1992 that requires them to provide auditable data to the Government Accountability Office of the U.S. Congress.
Every other agency does that. Every other Department does that, but the biggest budget of all, doesn’t do that. And he wants to give them more money! I mean, this is a Pentagon budget that loses billions of dollars in the Air Force spare parts, which they buy again because they can’t locate them in the far-flung warehouses around the world.
This is a Pentagon budget that admits to the loss, unaccountably, of $9 billion in the first few months of the criminal invasion of Iraq, by George W. Bush, and Dick Chaney. That’s $9 billion with a “B”, and he wants to give them more money. The hapless Democratic Party, of course, won’t point this out, but your reporter, Tom Hedges, has written about the not auditable Pentagon budget.
Trump doesn’t mention any of this, and neither does the mainstream media
But unfortunately, the rest of the mainstream press is not picking it up. So, you can have these crazy contradictions, and it’s what he doesn’t mention.
He talks about a few homicides by illegal immigrants, but fails to mention immigrants slain by US criminals
For example, he talks about terrorism, and a few homicides by illegal immigrants, he doesn’t talk about the immigrants who are in retail stores in the inner city, who have been slain by criminals who were born in the U.S., throughout the country. He doesn’t mention that at all.
Nor does he talk about the 5,000 deaths a week, 800 a day, that occur in US hospitals
But what he doesn’t mention is that 5,000 Americans a week are dying, because of mishaps that are preventable in hospitals. Who says so? Last March, Johns Hopkins University Medical School put it out — it’s 250,000 Americans dying every year, through preventable causes, hospital-induced infections, hospital malpractice, hospital errors, bad combinations of pharmaceuticals — and he doesn’t even mention it. That’s 5,000 a week, 800 a day! And the doctors, who did this study, said that was the minimum, conservative figure. That is probably much higher if they took clinics into account.
He talks about ending Obamacare, but neglects to talk about the $60 billion a year in fraudulent medical charges
And then he talks about abolishing Obamacare, and he doesn’t mention that the government he’s heading is being defrauded $60 billion a year, Medicare’s being defrauded by corporate, and other crooks, in the healthcare industry. He doesn’t even mention that. He doesn’t mention that over $340 billion this year will be drained away through computerized billing fraud and abuse, in the provision of healthcare sales — $340 billion, according to the applied mathematician expert, Professor Malcolm Sparrow at Harvard University — and an earlier study by the Government Accountability Office.
Bottom line, Trump delivered a well-orchestrated speech to rigged applause from Congress
So, what we have here is, an orchestrated speech by Donald Trump, and I think they really worked to make sure there was no low-level booing, as has often occurred, in State of the Union speeches. And they really worked on just massive applause that, you know, that when you hear it just on the radio, it just seems orchestrated and largely exaggerated.
Trump’s easily bruised ego required that kind of support to demonstrate a façade of GOP unity
But of course, you know, his easily bruised ego required that kind of calming, that kind of support, and I think the Republicans in the Congress basically agreed to it, because they were hell-bent on not having any division, before this big national audience — that they wanted to show that there was unity.
But actually, the Republicans, they’re going to give Trump all kinds of headaches, in all kinds of areas. Especially coming up with the money to rebuild our public works and infrastructure, along with what he wants to do on trade.
Is the billionaire class of Trump supporters not concerned about where all of this could lead?
Jay — A lot of the regulations that were created, and the agencies we talked about. They came about — one, because of the demand from the public; but it also came about that a lot of the elites recognized that if you don’t have some mitigation of these sorts of excesses of the economy, of capitalism, if it gets so extreme, it’s bad for the system itself and they, including…
You know, he didn’t talk about it tonight, but the deregulation, he said before, is also going to include finance. And the Dodd Frank Regulation, which he wants to get rid of, was already weak as heck, in terms of regulating Wall Street. But if you get rid of that, and have another free-for-all on Wall Street, all of these things are, you know, really systemic risks that…
Does the section of the billionaires, and the section of the elites, that are supporting this — are they not even themselves concerned what all this leads to?
Far-sighted CEOs know where this could lead, but right now “they’re in their giddy stage”
Nader — Yeah, I think they are, but you know you can’t underestimate the provision of sugar by Uncle Sam, to these corporate bosses. They’re sort of giddy now. I mean, they’ve seen the stock market soar since Trump was elected. They think with deregulation and corporate tax cuts; they’re going to make more profits. They think they’re going to be able to repatriate a couple trillion dollars of profits they’ve parked abroad, with minimal tax level of say, 5, 6, 7%.
Cut back the rule of law, and greed rules
So, they’re in their giddy stage. But I think the more far-seeing corporate executives, would have a sense of foreboding, because once the rule of law is cut back, the rule of greed, corporate greed emerges. And it has no limitations that it imposes on itself, like Wall Street speculation, with trillions of dollars of pension and mutual funds.
It has no self-imposed restraints, and it leads to things like recession, collapse, bailouts, taxpayer bailouts, shredding pensions, shredding the savings of Americans. Unemployment as the 2000 collapse, 2009 collapse, nine or eight million Americans, in terms of their jobs. So, it’s a short-term, long-term tension in the corporate community. But right now, they’re just giddy, with what Donald Trump is promising them.
Trump made his usual factual errors in his speech; for example, on crime rates, corporate tax rates
Again, he made his usual factual errors about the homicide rate being very high. It’s really about the lowest in many years, notwithstanding a spike in Chicago and a couple other towns, including Baltimore.
Again, he made an error by saying U.S. corporations are charged among the highest corporate taxes in the world. Yeah, the official rate is 35%, but the actual rate, after the loopholes and the exemptions and the deferrals, is about 16%. And there are many giant companies who, for year after year, paid nothing.
Like General Electric, for a number of years, after 2000, paid no federal income tax whatsoever. They so rigged the system that they actually got tens of millions of dollars back, as benefits from the Treasury. Verizon for a number of years, paid no federal income tax…
Jay — And one of the big problems facing the economy right now, is these corporations are sitting on, we’ve reported, mountains and mountains of cash that they don’t invest in the economy. And they’re partly paralyzing the economy. And he actually reduced their tax — that just means the mountain of cash they’re sitting on will be higher.
US corporations are buying back their stock and just sitting on piles of cash instead of investing in R&D, increasing workers’ wages, shoring up pension plans and more
Nader — And worse, they have so much cash, Paul, that in the last seven years, they’ve spent $2.5 trillion buying back their stock. And that’s like burning money. Imagine what $2.5 trillion would do, if it was invested in research and development, invested in higher pay for their workers, invested in shoring up the shaky pension systems in their companies, invested in productive and job-producing activities.
Meanwhile, top executives receive higher stock option values and increased bonuses
I’ve talked to very seasoned corporate leaders, who have retired, and they can speak freely, and I say, “What do you think of a company that buys back its stock?” And they say uniformly, they see a company with a failed management. A management that doesn’t know what to do with the profits, other than buy back the stock, in order to set up higher stock option values, and other remuneration for the top executives.
Walmart, for example, is buying back billions of dollars of its stock, in order to increase the wealth of the Walton family – Welcome to Trump’s reality show
So, imagine $2.5 trillion, and that includes, by the way, over $50 billion of stock buy-backs by Walmart, which is squeezing its hard-pressed employees, to a level where a million Walmart workers are making less today in inflation-adjusted wages, than Walmart workers made in 1968. In other words, a million Walmart workers are making less than $10.50 an hour, and if they had it adjusted, their wages for inflation would be about $11.10 an hour. So, Walmart is buying back billions of dollars of its stock, in order to increase the wealth of the Walton family that owns a huge portion of that corporation.
Jay — Right. All right, thanks very much for joining us, Ralph. I hope we can talk more soon.
END OF TRANSCRIPT
Transcript: President Trump’s speech to Congress, annotated by Vox staff , February 28, 2017 — Here is a transcript of the speech, including added annotations by Vox news staff as it was running live. Here’s just one example of a Trump claim followed by a Vox annotation –
Trump — And we are imposing a new rule which mandates that for every one new regulation, two old regulations must be eliminated.
Vox — The executive order Trump is referring to does not in fact mandate that two old regulations be eliminated for any one new one. Instead, for every new regulation proposed, the relevant agency must identify two old regulations that could be eliminated at some point — something much weaker. Brad Plumer has more here.
FAIR USE NOTICE – For details click here