Citizen Action Monitor

On LNG, Canadians were promised “intelligent leadership”, but instead get broken promises, dogmatic decisions

PM Trudeau, his environment minister, and BC premier Christy Clark continue to ignore opposition to LNG

No 1693 Posted by fw, June 5, 2016

Brenda Broughton

Brenda Broughton

“It is vital to oppose the previous government’s disregard and denial of science. However, this new government appears to be cherry-picking the science it uses and then hiding behind the science against the interests of citizens and against the science needing review to meet COP 21 commitments…. Canadians were promised intelligent leadership and we are receiving dogmatic decisions not based upon intelligent leadership. This now must become a public discussion.”Brenda Broughton, former mayor of Lions Bay, BC

LNG, the BC story that won’t go away. BC’s defiant Brenda Broughton proclaims: “Ministers who continue to minimize rather than make courageous leadership decisions on behalf of the environment and Canada’s COP 21 goals…should step aside from their Cabinet posts immediately.”

Brenda’s outspoken opposition to LNG follows hard on the heels of two recent posts on this contentious issue: BC Premier Clark’s albatross — LNG project would become Canada’s largest GHG emitter May 30, 2016, and Trudeau breaks promise, BC community blasts federal minister’s rush to approve LNG project March 29, 2016.

The heat is on.

To read Brenda’s original story, click on the following linked title. Alternatively, below is a repost with added subheadings. As well, one small part of the piece has been revised to enhance readability.

**********

Longtime Lions Bay Mayor: LNG is plain dirty, violates Canada’s climate commitments by Brenda Broughton, Common Sense Canadian, June 3, 2016

Trudeau government cherry-picking climate science, then hiding behind the science against the interests of citizens

It is vital to oppose the previous government’s disregard and denial of science. However, this new government appears to be cherry-picking the science it uses and then hiding behind the science against the interests of citizens and against the science needing review to meet COP 21 commitments.

Only Feds and BC government are misleadingly promoting LNG as “clean or cleaner” energy

No part of the word ‘clean’ should be used in association with LNG, as LNG is NOT clean energy. This is very clearly stated by the oil and gas industry. It is very curious that the Provincial and Federal governments are refusing to acknowledge this clear fact-based science that LNG is NOT clean energy. It is only government, not industry, that is attempting to erroneously and wrongly market LNG as clean or cleaner energy.

Governments are failing COP 21.

Canadians were promised “intelligent leadership”, but instead get dogmatic decisions

Courageous leadership is essential. Canadians were promised intelligent leadership and we are receiving dogmatic decisions not based upon intelligent leadership. This now must become a public discussion.

Woodfibre LNG is wrong, science and scientists report that it is wrong for the environment and acts against COP 21 goals.

On February 9th, 2016, without notice, the CEAA [Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency] called for public comment on the [Woodfibre LNG] GHG emissions and upstream impacts. Public comment ended March 1st, 2016, thus providing only 3 weeks for feedback.

99.1% of comments submitted were opposed to Woodfibre LNG, citing concerns over emissions and upstream impacts

In this brief period the CEAA received 9, 980 public comments. In analyzing the comments including the just short of 100 verbal presentations, there were 11 neutral, 83 written letters of support, with only a handful addressing the science, and 99.1% opposed, that is, approximately 9,800 comments of opposition with most comments addressing the GHG emissions and the upstream impacts.

Yet Canada’s environment minister McKenna didn’t get around to reading about the 99.1% opposing LNG

At the Liberal Convention [in Winnipeg] ‘People, People, People’ was said to be important by several including the Prime Minister, and yet the Minister of Environment [Catherine McKenna] appears to not have even reviewed these CEAA responses and stated that they relied on the BCEAO [BC Environmental Assessment Office] analysis, which was not based upon science and was concluded prior to COP 21. Science and sustainability also includes people.

Woodfibre LNG will not produce any revenue for the following reasons:

  1. PST forgiveness negotiated for LNG export in BC;
  2. NEB allowance for an offshore Woodfibre company for retail sales;
  3. Provincial carbon tax forgiveness of 5 million tonnes;
  4. Total 32 jobs which after payroll tax paid
  5. Province of BC will pay net to Woodfibre LNG between $200,000 to $600,000 dollars annually;
  6. No tax revenue will be realized and our economy, environment, fisheries, marine and human safety will be seriously compromised as Howe Sound and its beauty are an economic driver for Canada.

Moreover, McKenna did not review the relevant science and has avoided meeting with the people of Howe Sound BC, where the LNG plant will be built

The Squamish First Nation has no jurisdiction over most of Howe Sound. The peoples of Howe Sound are very concerned, as their opposition is not being heard. The Minister of Environment appears to have not reviewed the science and also to be turning her back on, or avoiding speaking or meeting with the people expressing real and serious concerns.

Howe Sound should have rejected because it doesn’t meet international shipping lane standards

Supertanker Shipping does not meet the International SIGTTO Shipping lane standards, thus in the United States, Howe Sound would have automatically been rejected as a possible LNG Supertanker Shipping lane as it is too dangerous, with pre-existing population and pre-existing commerce.

The LNG plant’s design technology is outlawed in the US, and, if used, will have negative impacts in the region

Woodfibre LNG is the only single cycle water exchange design among the BC LNG proposals. This is outlawed in the United States and any LNG plants with the single cycle have changed them or are on notice for change. The single cycle water exchange will damage herring roe, and thus harm the health of Howe Sound. The herring roe is drawing dolphins, who are drawing whales to Howe Sound.

The single cycle will also warm the water further harming spawning grounds and potentially attracting warm water primitive sea life, such as sharks. Howe Sound has been in an active recovery for decades and had a significant pink salmon catch of 300,000 recently. This renewal of the fish has taken decades to accomplish following a decades-long and amazing clean up. Howe Sound is a regular swimming location at Lions Bay, Porteau Cove, Bowen Island, Gambier Island, Anvil Island, Camp Potlach and is the home of many children’s camps for the Metro Vancouver region.

Ministers who minimize the risks of an LNG plant at Howe Sound should step aside immediately

The growing addiction to minimization of the environmental damage that will occur if Woodfibre LNG goes ahead, must stop. Ministers who continue to minimize rather than make courageous leadership decisions on behalf of the environment and Canada’s COP 21 goals, for the economy now and in the future, should step aside from their Cabinet posts immediately.

Brenda implores you to reverse the Woodfibre LNG decision, with the Minister of Transport and the Minister of Fisheries, advisedly and unequivocally denying permits.

Brenda Broughton, MA, RCC is the former 5 term mayor of the Village of Lions Bay and Envisioner and former Charter Chair of the Howe Sound Community Forum.

FAIR USE NOTICE – For details click here

%d bloggers like this: