No 1692 Posted by fw, June 4, 2016
According to a June 3, 2016 Canadian Press report, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau signalled Friday he would take a firm stand with China on human rights. The report was prompted by an incident in which a visiting Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi blasted a Canadian journalist.
In a press conference following the Wang Yi incident, Trudeau spoke out about the importance of raising human rights concerns when engaged in the world. Here are three of the PMs’ quotable quotes on human rights:
Foreign Affairs minister Stephane Dion also took the press conference opportunity to note that he, too, had raised human rights and consular affairs issues in his meeting with Wang:
“I did it very, very frankly in my meetings with the Chinese minister and I even raised with him the case of the rights for Chinese journalists in China,” said Dion. “I think that’s the best way to see progress made.”
Dion also tweeted –
“And your questions provided an immediate example, which I used in my meeting to highlight how important #humanrights are for Canadians.” .8:36 AM – 3 Jun 2016
Trudeau and Dion’s hypocritical human rights double standard over Israel-Palestine
With China, Trudeau and Dion were quick to speak out about human rights.
However, with Israel-Palestine, the evidence clearly reveals that Trudeau and Dion apply a hypocritical double standard.
To quote, in full, from my Open letter to PM Trudeau — Why his willingness to criticize Israel is an empty gesture, posted April 5, 2016 —
About a month ago you responded to questions put to you by citizens attending a global town hall event on foreign policy, hosted by The Huffington Post Canada. Selected portions of your responses, along with an accompanying video clip, were subsequently featured in a March 7 HuffPost story, Trudeau Says His Government Willing to Criticize Canada’s ‘Friend’ Israel.
With reference to the March 7 story, as a responsibly informed Canadian on the history of the Israel-Palestine conflict, your answers, presented below, do not stand up to my critical scrutiny.
Consider your answers, followed by my comments —
1/ “The fact is we’re taking a position that is much more in keeping with Canada’s position, Canada’s traditional approach, which is, first of all, recognize that Israel is a friend, Israel is an ally, Israel is a country that has values and an approach on many, many issues that are very much aligned with Canadian values…”
To make the astonishing declaration that Israel’s “values and an approach on many, many issues” align with Canada’s values deeply offends me. It is, to quote UK writer Stuart Littlewood, tantamount to aligning Canada with a “vile villainy”. Whatever meaning you may have intended when you uttered those words, here’s what I surmised: 1) you have consciously decided to remain willfully ignorant of the history of the region; 2) you are aware of the history but reject the relevance of morality in political decision making; and 3) in a calculated political move, you are preaching chapter and verse to your pro-Israel supporters here and abroad.
2/ [We] won’t hesitate from talking about unhelpful steps like the continued illegal settlements. We will point that out. We will continue to engage in a forthright and open way because that’s what people expect of Canada…. That approach is much more in keeping with where Canada needs to be and that’s what we’re going to do.”
Quote 2 clearly illustrates that impunity underpins your willingness to criticize Israel. You can talk and talk and talk about the illegal settlements until you’re blue in the face, Israel responds with a slap in the face, the settlements continue to be built. What’s the point of criticism if there are no meaningful consequences attached to the message?
3/ There are times where we disagree with our friends and we will not hesitate from pointing that out. There are times when we agree with our friends and will stand with them. And there are times we will disagree with our friends, but we will stand by our friends. We’ve all had that friend we’ve had to do that for
As for quote 3, once again impunity drives your pro-Israel policy. Bottom line, your message to Israel is clear — We’ll stand by you no matter what you do to Palestinians. You have carte blanche. At worst, we may “point out’ to you where we disagree. But not to worry: “we will stand by our friends”. Long live impunity.
4/ The demonization, the de-legitimization or the double standard that’s often applied to Israel is not helping reach the two-state solution of a peaceful, democratic Palestinian state alongside a peaceful, democratic Israel.”
You refer to “…the double standard that’s often applied to Israel.” Really? How hypocritical. What about the Liberal’s own pro-Israel double standard? And once again, we find a resurrection of the worn-out platitude: “the two-state solution of a peaceful… blah, blah, blah. Not even your friend, Netanyahu, subscribes to this red herring any more. Its usefulness as a delaying tactic, during which new settlements were built, is no longer necessary.
Returning to quote 2, the benign “we won’t hesitate from talking about unhelpful steps “, is an empty gesture. Given the pronounced pro-Israel bias in the mainstream media, it is highly unlikely you will find much of anything to “talk about” with your “friend”. If you are at all serious about finding more substantial topics of conversation to discuss with the Israelis, I suggest that you have an advisor choose topics from the web pages of any of the dozens of online news and information sources that offer fairer, more balanced coverage of the Israel-Palestine conflict.
Here, for example, is a sample of 12 recent news items from an Israeli source, B’Tselem, the Israeli Information Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories, established in 1989 by a group of prominent academics, attorneys, journalists, and Knesset members –
Finally, I leave you with Stuart Littlewood’s interpretation of the meaning and significance of what it really means to be a “friend of Israel”
May you have abundant opportunities to practice your criticism of Israel — candid criticism with accountability, please.
Impunity defines PM Trudeau’s willingness to criticize Israel : And how will he find out when criticism of Israel is warranted? Certainly not from mainstream media. – posted March 28, 2016
FAIR USE NOTICE – For details click here