Citizen Action Monitor

TPP approval will force Canada to change digital policies to conform to “Made in America” standards

“Attempts to preserve Canadian law were unsuccessful,” says legal expert Michael Geist

No 1517 Posted by fw, November 17, 2015

Michael Geist

Michael Geist

“As Canadians assess the 6,000-page agreement, the implications for digital policies such as copyright and privacy should command considerable attention. On those fronts, the agreement appears to be a major failure. Canadian negotiators adopted a defensive strategy by seeking to maintain existing national laws and doing little to extend Canadian policies to other countries. The result is a deal that the U.S. has rightly promoted as ‘Made in America.’ In fact, even the attempts to preserve Canadian law were unsuccessful. The TPP will require several important changes to domestic copyright rules including an extension in the term of copyright that will keep works out of the public domain for an additional 20 years. New Zealand, which faces a similar requirement, has estimated that the extension alone will cost its economy NZ$55 million per year. The Canadian cost is undoubtedly far higher.”Michael Geist, The Tyee

In the repost below, Michael Geist, Canada Research Chair in internet and E-commerce Law at the University of Ottawa, summarizes his TPP concerns, concluding “digital policies form the backbone of the innovation economy, which may be hamstrung by an agreement that does little to advance Canadian law and policy.” He warns Canadians not to be misled by the spin of pro-TPP enthusiasts.

To read Geist’s original piece, click on the following linked title, or read the repost with added subheadings. And don’t miss the embedded 94-minute video at the end of this post featuring professor Geist sharing thoughts on his comprehensive work on the Trans-Pacific Partnership and Intellectual Property Rights.

**********

Why TPP Is a Canadian Digital Policy Failure by Michael Geist, TheTyee.ca, November 17, 2015

American-style copyright extension, digital lock rules may hamstring our innovation sector.

TPP worst-ever policy moves, could cost us billions

The official release of the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP), a global trade agreement between 12 countries including Canada, the United States, and Japan, has sparked a heated public debate over the merits of the deal. Leading the opposition is Research in Motion mogul Jim Balsillie, who has described the TPP as one of Canada’s worst-ever policy moves that could cost the country billions of dollars.

On the digital policy front, TPP is a “Made in America” deal

As Canadians assess the 6,000-page agreement, the implications for digital policies such as copyright and privacy should command considerable attention. On those fronts, the agreement appears to be a major failure. Canadian negotiators adopted a defensive strategy by seeking to maintain existing national laws and doing little to extend Canadian policies to other countries. The result is a deal that the U.S. has rightly promoted as “Made in America.”

TPP will require punishing and costly changes to domestic copyright rules

In fact, even the attempts to preserve Canadian law were unsuccessful. The TPP will require several important changes to domestic copyright rules including an extension in the term of copyright that will keep works out of the public domain for an additional 20 years. New Zealand, which faces a similar requirement, has estimated that the extension alone will cost its economy NZ$55 million per year. The Canadian cost is undoubtedly far higher.

Canada would have to provide the US with confidential reports every six months on counterfeit products

In addition to term extension, Canada is required to add new criminal provisions to its digital lock rules and to provide the U.S. with confidential reports every six months on efforts to stop the entry of counterfeit products into the country.

Required policy changes would have to conform to US standards, while Canadian policies are absent

While these are all changes that reflect U.S. standards, there was little effort to promote some of Canada’s more innovative copyright policies in the agreement. The U.S. has allowed Canada to keep its “notice-and-notice” policy for Internet providers, but on the condition that no other TPP country may adopt it. Meanwhile, Canadian policies that promote user-generated content, limit statutory damages, or establish consumer exceptions are all missing from TPP.

The absence of Canadian policies in the agreement is also reflected in the privacy and e-commerce provisions. Canada features national privacy laws, but the TPP allows countries to meet the privacy requirements with enforceable “voluntary undertakings,” a nod to the weaker U.S. approach. Similarly, Canadian net neutrality regulations and anti-spam rules cannot be found in the TPP, which instead features watered-down versions of each.

TPP bans digital protections related to personal information and foreign-bound data transfers

The TPP also bans certain digital protections that may come back to haunt Canadian policy makers. For example, it restricts legislative initiatives that require storage of personal information in Canada or that limit data transfers outside the country. It also creates a ban on rules requiring the disclosure of software source code found in mass-market products, a provision that has cyber-security experts and consumer advocates concerned about the implications for detecting harmful software or products that fail to comply with consumer protection or environmental standards (such as Volkswagen’s emissions violations).

Be prepared for TPP intervention in Canadian hands-off Internet policies

The agreement even reverses the longstanding Canadian hands-off approach to the Internet. While Canada has previously rejected regulation of the domain name system, the TPP mandates domain name registrant information disclosure requirements and intellectual property protections for each country-code domain, a remarkable intervention into Internet policy.

Failure to comply with TPP rules could result in ISDS lawsuits

Failure to fully comply with the agreement would subject the Canadian government to potential lawsuits under the TPP’s investor-state dispute settlement rules. With Canada already facing a $500 million lawsuit from Eli Lilly over its patent rules, the TPP could usher in a wave of claims focused on challenges to flexible copyright rules, privacy protections, and net neutrality regulations.

Don’t let TPP proponents spin you with gains in other areas – for Canada, digital policies are paramount

Proponents of the TPP will likely point to gains in other areas to justify support for the deal. Yet digital policies form the backbone of the innovation economy, which may be hamstrung by an agreement that does little to advance Canadian law and policy.

Michael Geist holds the Canada Research Chair in internet and E-commerce Law at the University of Ottawa, Faculty of Law. He can reached at mgeist@uottawa.ca or online at www.michaelgeist.ca.

SEE ALSO

Canada and the TPP: A Digital Policy Failure (94 minutes) by Michael Geist, Centre for International Governance Innovation, November 16, 2015. — Professor Geist shared his thoughts from his comprehensive work on the Trans-Pacific Partnership and Intellectual Property Rights. After his remarks, there was a discussion.

FAIR USE NOTICE – For details click here

Information

This entry was posted on November 17, 2015 by in evidence based counterpower, political action, rights and freedoms and tagged , .
%d bloggers like this: