Citizen Action Monitor

Everything you wanted to know about strategic voting Canada 2015… but couldn’t be bothered asking

If you weren’t confused before, this guide to strategic voting might just do it

No 1456 Posted by fw, September 21, 2015

“Voting strategically is, however, difficult and uncertain. You can never be completely sure that it will work. Not only do you need to know the current voting intentions in your riding (this is the part where we can help, with our projections), it also requires many other people to do the same thing as you. The latter part requires a level of coordination that makes the effectiveness of strategic voting doubtful. There are, however, resources dedicated to helping this cause, such as Strategic Voting 2015 or Vote Swap.

As we can see [from the list of ridings below], there are a limited number of ridings where voting strategically has some potential. Excluding the Bloc Québécois, we are talking of between 12 and 15 ridings per party. As mentioned [in the article], even if you vote in one of them and your current choice is projected to have no chance, remember that you don’t have to vote strategically. It’s our opinion that voters shouldn’t have to compensate for the effects of an imperfect electoral system. Also, this calculation is based on projections and, despite our best efforts, they are never perfect. If, however, you do indeed want to vote strategically, we hope the [following] guide will be useful to you.”Bryan Breguet, Huffington Post

**********

Strategic Voting In The 2015 Federal Election: A Complete Guide (ANALYSIS) by Bryan Breguet, The Huffington Post Canada, September 21, 2015

For many people, their vote will likely not make any difference on Oct. 19.

Because of how our system works, there are many electoral districts where some candidates have no realistic chance of winning. Even worse, in many instances, vote splitting could occur that would allow one candidate to win despite there being a large majority of voters who favoured other candidates.

Situations also occur in which some voters would rather vote against one candidate rather than for another one. For instance, a recent poll by Léger found that as much as 31 per cent of voters were voting against a candidate. Specifically for this election, there are many voters who simply want to vote against Stephen Harper and the Conservatives (the so-called ABC movement).

For all these reasons (and more), some people consider voting strategically. This means not voting for their top choice but for another candidate they consider more likely to win.

Voting strategically is, however, difficult and uncertain. You can never be completely sure that it will work. Not only do you need to know the current voting intentions in your riding (this is the part where we can help, with our projections), it also requires many other people to do the same thing as you. The latter part requires a level of coordination that makes the effectiveness of strategic voting doubtful. There are, however, resources dedicated to helping this cause, such as Strategic Voting 2015 or Vote Swap.

We should also mention that, beyond the low likelihood of success of voting strategically, we don’t necessarily think people should do it. This article therefore shouldn’t be seen as an endorsement of this practice. We understand the desire for doing it, as our electoral system is indeed frustrating at times, but remember that voting is about more than picking the winner.

Ridings where strategic voting might have potential

So, when could voting strategically work? We need to establish some parameters. We’ll look at ridings where there is a race between two or more candidates — a riding where the winner is projected to take more than 50 per cent of the vote is obviously not a candidate for strategic voting.

A close race is defined, for the purpose of this guide, as a riding where the winner has less than an 80 per cent chance of winning, while the closer candidate is at least at 20-25 per cent. In term of voting intentions, this usually means races where the gap is five points or less. As stated before, the level of coordination required for strategic voting to be effective means that we should restrict our analysis to a small set of ridings. Strategic voting won’t prevent a victory by a candidate leading by 20 points.

We also list a riding as being worth voting strategically only for voters whose favoured party has either no or a very small chance of winning. A riding with a tight three-way race doesn’t qualify. In these situations, even if your favourite candidate is currently third, you should vote according to your top choice. We are talking here of having way less than a five per cent chance.

Additionally, we consider a riding only if there are enough potential voters who could vote strategically. For instance, a riding where the Liberal candidate is at 40 per cent, the Conservative at 35 per cent and the NDP at five doesn’t qualify — you’d literally need every NDP voter to vote strategically. This is a fraction way too high to be realistic.

Finally, it’s important to note that we aren’t looking to change the composition of the House of Commons in any systematic way. Specifically, we aren’t simply looking at situations where Liberals and NDP voters could coordinate to defeat a Conservative one.

Our mission is simply to show ridings where voters of some parties might choose differently if they want their votes to make a difference. This means, for instance, that we list ridings where Tory voters might want to consider making a choice between the NDP and Liberals. Similarly, we could imagine NDP voters wanting to help the Conservative candidate in a close race with the Liberals. In other words, we allow for every possibility.

We won’t talk specifically about Green supporters, since their party has a chance in only a couple of ridings. It’s therefore implicit that they are among the voters who could have an incentive to vote strategically. Moreover, the projections usually don’t place the Green candidate high enough to meet our requirement about having enough potential voters to be able to change the outcome.

Complete list of ridings for each party’s voters

Here is the complete list of ridings for each party’s voters. For Quebec ridings, we indicated the parties in the race. In the rest of Canada, it’s obviously between the other two main parties.

Ridings where Conservatives could vote strategically for NDP or Liberals:

Newfoundland and Labrador
St. John’s South–Mount Pearl

Nova Scotia
South Shore–St. Margarets

Quebec
Ahuntsic-Cartierville, NDP vs. LPC
Bourassa, NDP vs. LPC
Dorval–Lachine–LaSalle, NDP vs. LPC
Gaspésie–Les Îles-de-la-Madeleine. One of the few four-way races. However, the Conservatives appear to be last.
Ville-Marie–Le Sud-Ouest–Île-des-Sœurs, NDP vs. LPC

Ontario
Beaches–East York
Brampton East
Scarborough North
Scarborough Southwest
University–Rosedale
York South–Weston

Alberta
Edmonton Centre

Ridings where Liberals could vote strategically for the Conservatives, NDP, or Bloc:

Quebec
Bécancour–Nicolet–Saurel, NDP vs. Bloc
Lévis–Lotbinière, CPC vs. NDP
Louis-Saint-Laurent. Riding of former CAQ (and ADQ) MLA Gérard Deltell against NDP candidate G. Daniel Caron
Montmagny–L’Islet–Kamouraska–Rivière-du-Loup, CPC vs. NDP

Ontario
Essex
Oshawa

Saskatchewan
Regina–Qu’Appelle

Alberta
Edmonton Manning
Edmonton Mill woods
Lethbridge

British Columbia
Coquitlam–Port Coquitlam
Kamloops–Thompson–Cariboo
Mission–Matsqui–Fraser Canyon
Pitt Meadows–Maple Ridge

Ridings where New Democrats could vote strategically for the Conservatives or Liberals:

Nova Scotia
Cumberland–Colchester

New Brunswick
Miramichi–Grand Lake
Tobique–Mactaquac

Ontario
Aurora–Oak Ridges–Richmond Hill
Brampton North
Glengarry–Prescott–Russell
Haldimand–Norfolk
King–Vaughan
Markham–Stouffville
Newmarket–Aurora
Oakville
Ottawa West–Nepean
Oakville North–Burlington
Vaughan–Woodbridge

Manitoba
Charleswood–St. James–Assiniboia–Headingley

Alberta
Calgary Confederation
Calgary Skyview
British Columbia
Richmond Centre
South Surrey–White Rock

FAIR USE NOTICE – For details click here

Information

This entry was posted on September 21, 2015 by in evidence based counterpower, political action and tagged , .
%d bloggers like this: