Citizen Action Monitor

G7 and EU climate plans place world at “extreme risk” of failing to hold warming below 2°C limit

Richest countries agree to keep emissions at about present levels for next 15 years, instead of cutting them fast

No 1365 Posted by fw, June 9, 2015

climate change

“The combined climate plans for the G7 and the EU mark ‘a small step towards the right track to hold warming to 2°C, but they still leave a substantial emissions gap,’ according to analysts from CAT [Climate Action Tracker], which reports on countries’ emissions commitments and performance. The gap yawns so wide that the present level of commitment shown by the two blocs would go less than one-third of the way to staying within the 2°C limit, they find. And they say there is ‘an extreme risk’ that this low level of ambition could continue until 2030 to keep emissions so high that it would be impossible to stay within the 2°C warming limit, agreed by the world’s governments.” Alex Kirby, Climate News Network

Looks like geophysicist Brad Werner may have had a premonition of what was to come when, at a formal presentation of one of the world’s largest scientific gatherings. (American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting, December, 2012), he brashly titled his paper “Is Earth F**cked?” He then proceeded to tell the audience just how f**ked we are. Of course humans are hardwired to ignore threats that are not immediate or local.

Click on the following linked title to read Kirby’s original article. Alternatively, read below a reposting with an added link to a paper by climate scientist James Hansen pointing out just how dangerous a global warming of 2°C would be. “Irreparable harm,” he said.

**********

Rich Countries climate plans leave yawning gap by Alex Kirby, Climate News Network, June 8, 2015

Some of the world’s richest countries are not doing enough to limit their greenhouse gas emissions, according to new analysis.

The report by Climate Action Tracker (CAT) says that all the G7 countries and the member states of the European Union (EU) have so far agreed to keep their emissions at around their present levels for the next 15 years, instead of cutting them fast.

With the G7 countries meeting in Germany yesterday and today, CAT—a consortium of four research organizations—has looked at the combined INDCs [Intended Nationally Determined Contribution] of all G7 governments and the EU, who account together for around 30 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions and 40 percent of global gross domestic product (GDP).

The combined climate plans for the G7 and the EU mark “a small step towards the right track to hold warming to 2°C*, but they still leave a substantial emissions gap,” according to analysts from CAT, which reports on countries’ emissions commitments and performance. [*SEE: James Hansen — Widely accepted target of limiting warming to 2C would subject future generations to irreparable harm].

The gap yawns so wide that the present level of commitment shown by the two blocs would go less than one-third of the way to staying within the 2°C limit, they find.

Extreme risk

And they say there is “an extreme risk” that this low level of ambition could continue until 2030 to keep emissions so high that it would be impossible to stay within the 2°C warming limit, agreed by the world’s governments.

The concern is based on what climate negotiators call the blocs’ Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs), undertakings given by governments about what each of them will do to implement the global agreement on tackling climate change that they hope to reach at the UN climate change conference in Paris later this year.

With the G7 countries meeting in Germany yesterday and today, CAT—a consortium of four research organizations—has looked at the combined INDCs of all G7 governments and the EU, who account together for around 30 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions and 40 percent of global gross domestic product (GDP).

The current policies of the G7 and the EU, CAT says, are projected only to stabilize emissions through 2030 at close to present levels, despite the need for a rapid decline in emissions.

The combined effect of the G7 and EU INDCs for 2025 and 2030 would bring the group to no more than 20-30 percent of the reductions needed to stay within the two degrees Celsius limit, or the more stringent 1.5°C threshold for which many climate scientists are pressing.

The authors say the G7 and EU governments must significantly improve on the INDCs they have submitted so far before the Paris talks start on Nov. 30. They also urge that the INDC commitments should be limited in time—for example, to the five years from 2021 to 2025—to avoid locking in emissions levels that are inconsistent with the two degrees Celsius and 1.5 degrees Celsius thresholds.

Major steps

“This gap shows us that it’s very clear the G7 and EU need to urgently revise their current policies,” says Bill Hare, of Climate Analytics, one of the consortium members. “They need to review—and increase—their stated climate plans before Paris, so that the Paris Agreement can make major steps towards setting the world on a below 2°C pathway.

“The G7+EU INDCs on the table now show there is an extreme risk of locking in, until 2030, high emissions levels that are inconsistent with holding warming below 2°C and to 1.5°C. Waiting 15 years from today to increase emissions reductions—and 10 years after the 2020 agreement comes into force—could be very dangerous for the planet.”

The authors say the EU’s policies would bring it close to achieving its INDC in 2030, but the U.S., Canada and Japan still have a lot of work to do. They call Canada’s INDC and Japan’s draft INDC “inadequate.”

FAIR USE NOTICE – For details click here

Information

This entry was posted on June 9, 2015 by in climate change, evidence based counterpower, information counterpower and tagged , .
%d bloggers like this: