Citizen Action Monitor

US mainstream media slavishly toe Israeli government line in conflict reports

Don’t bother to correct the record even when confronted with the inconvenient truth

No 555 Posted by fw August 27, 2012

I will continue to re-post stories of Israeli injustice towards, and brutality against, Palestinians as long as the pro-Israeli mainstream media in Canada, the U.S. and Europe continue to ignore, censor or distort the truth about the Middle East conflict.

“U.S. media have made a habit of credulously relaying Israeli officials’ claims, even when baseless or undermined by available evidence. It appears that habit holds even when Israel itself provides that evidence.” 

Thanks to Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) for its vigilant reporting of the US’ mainstream media misreporting of the Israel-Palestine conflict.  A recent example of FAIR’s coverage of US media’s pro-Israeli complicity appears below. And the related story link at the end of the post, from a May 2000 FAIR report, reveals the media’s ongoing and utter disregard for any semblance of fairness and accuracy in reporting.

Israel Takes Back Gaza Charge—After Attack  by Alex Kane, FAIR Extra, January 2012

U.S. media fail to notice retraction of accusations

When armed militants crossed the Egyptian border last August [2011] and launched a multi-pronged attack on Israeli civilians and soldiers in Eilat that killed eight people, U.S. media repeated the Israeli government line, blaming the attack on Palestinians from Gaza. Three months later, Israel itself has concluded that the attackers were Egyptian—but U.S. media have failed to correct the record.

As Israelis reeled from the August 18 assault, Ehud Barak, Israel’s defense minister, declared that the “source of the terrorist attacks is Gaza.” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu pointed to a group based in Gaza called the Popular Resistance Committees (PRC), which firmly denied the accusation. Hours after the Eilat attacks, Israeli warplanes raided the Gaza Strip, setting off more than a week of fighting between Israel and Palestinian fighters. One Israeli civilian and 17 Palestinians, including eight civilians, were killed as a result, according to Human Rights Watch (9/11/11).

U.S. establishment media echoed the Israeli leadership’s line. The New York Daily News account (8/19/11) of the attacks relayed as fact the Israeli government’s claims that “Palestinian gunmen killed eight people in a multistage terror attack.” James Hider, the London Times Mideast correspondent, told NPR (8/23/11) that “a group of suspected Palestinian militants escaped out of Gaza…and started attacking Israelis.” And the New York Times Isabel Kershner wrote (9/1/11) that the “mid-August attack” in Eilat was carried out “by Palestinian militants.”

But it took only a day for questions to emerge about the Israeli government’s narrative. In an interview with the Real News Network (8/19/11), an Israeli military spokesperson contradicted Netanyahu, saying, “We did not say this group [the PRC] was responsible for the terror attack,” although she continued to insist the attackers were from Gaza. This was followed by an independent Egyptian newspaper’s report (Al Masry Al Youm, 8/21/11) that Egyptian authorities had identified three of the attackers, one of whom it said was the leader of an Egyptian “terrorist cell.”

A report by the respected Israeli journalist Amira Hass (Ha’aretz8/25/11) dealt further blows to the story. Hass wrote: “There is no sign [in Gaza] of the traditional mourners’ tents for the relatives of militants killed by the Israel Defense Forces…. [This] reinforces the general sense in the Strip that the perpetrators of the attack were not from Gaza.”

The Israeli leadership’s story completely unraveled a month later, when an internal Israeli military investigation “determined that all of those who actually participated in the attack were Egyptians” (, 9/21/11). Although the IDF continued to claim that the PRC “sponsored” the attack, bloggers such as +972’s Yossi Gurvitz (8/25/11) and Richard Silverstein (9/21/11) have debunked that claim as well. The Egyptian government arrested a suspect in the attack in the Sinai town of El-Arish in mid-November, describing him as the leader of an Al-Qaeda–inspired cell (AP, 11/13/11).

But the U.S. corporate press, save for that one blog post in Time, failed to report on the newly disclosed information that debunks the Israeli government’s claims of Palestinian involvement in the attacks—claims that were used to justify military retaliation that led to the killing of innocent civilians.

Instead, journalists continued to get the facts of the attacks dead wrong. New York Times Jerusalem bureau chief Ethan Bronner stated (10/12/11) that “Israel had apologized to Egypt for the deaths of several of its troops by Israeli forces chasing Palestinian militants into Sinai in August.”

Another New York Times article (10/30/11), written as a new round of violence flared in Gaza, reported that the Eilat attacks were “orchestrated” by Gazan members of the PRC. Foreign Policy’s Mideast Channel blog also ran a piece (10/25/11) by former Washington Post Jerusalem bureau chief Janine Zacharia, who stated: “Palestinians infiltrated from Egypt and killed eight Israelis this past August.” These claims continue to appear in mainstream media outlets despite having been debunked a month earlier.

As Extra! has repeatedly demonstrated (e.g., 4/11, 8/102/09), U.S. media have made a habit of credulously relaying Israeli officials’ claims, even when baseless or undermined by available evidence. It appears that habit holds even when Israel itself provides that evidence.

Alex Kane is a freelance journalist and blogger based in New York City ( He can be followed on Twitter @alexbkane.

ABOUT FAIR, the national media watch group, has been offering well-documented criticism of media bias and censorship since 1986. We work to invigorate the First Amendment by advocating for greater diversity in the press and by scrutinizing media practices that marginalize public interest, minority and dissenting viewpoints. As an anti-censorship organization, we expose neglected news stories and defend working journalists when they are muzzled. As a progressive group, FAIR believes that structural reform is ultimately needed to break up the dominant media conglomerates, establish independent public broadcasting and promote strong non-profit sources of information.


  • US News Media A Security Zone for Israel by Norman Solomon, Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR), May 25, 2000. “One phrase — “security zone” — sums up an entire era of media spin about Israel’s 22-year occupation of southern Lebanon. When Israel completed its pullout in late May, most U.S. news outlets remained in sync with the kind of coverage that they’ve provided for more than two decades. In March 1978, the U.N. Security Council demanded unconditional Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon. Ever since, the flagrantly illegal — and brutal — military occupation has been shrouded by a thick media haze in the United States.”
Fair Use Notice: This blog, Citizen Action Monitor, may contain copyrighted material that may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material, published without profit, is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues. It is published in accordance with the provisions of the 2004 Supreme Court of Canada ruling and its six principle criteria for evaluating fair dealing

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


This entry was posted on August 27, 2012 by in information counterpower, moral & ethical counterpower and tagged , .
%d bloggers like this: