Citizen Action Monitor

Harper’s Canada headed for two-tier country, one for rich, one for poor

No 389 Posted by fw, January 22, 2012

“Perhaps luckily for the Maritimes, the concept of transfer payments was enshrined in the Constitution in 1982, but this will not stop the Harper government from trying to compensate for the payments in one way or another. If Harper gets his way in bringing a near-total market-driven economy to Canada, we could very well end up with a two-tier country – one for the rich and one for the poor.”Nick Fillmore

So says this Canadian award-winning investigative reporter in a January 18, 2012 post in his blog: Unless people take action, Harper’s scheme will mean ‘Goin’ Down the Road’ for Maritimers. An abridgement of Fillmore’s original piece is reposted below with my added subheadings and other minor format revisions.

But first, for those who may not be familiar with Fillmore’s Goin’ Down the Road reference in his article’s title, Wikipedia notes:

. . . a 1970 Canadian film directed by Donald Shebib. It chronicles the lives of two twenty-somethings from the Maritimes who move to Toronto in order to find a better life. . . . They find minimum wage jobs ($2 per hour for a 40 hour week), which still pay much better than anything available back home. . . . It is generally regarded as one of the best and most influential Canadian films of all time and has received considerable critical acclaim for its true-to-life performances.

On a personal note, I saw the movie when it was first released. One heartbreaking scene that remains indelibly etched in my memory is that of a displaced, misplaced, young Nova Scotian, Peter McGraw (actor Doug McGrath), furtively watching a beautiful young woman, presumably a University of Toronto student, as they browse the LPs in Toronto’s landmark Sam The Record Man’s Yonge Street store. McGraw watches, but his face reveals all — he knows there is an unbreachable world of difference between them.

The up and coming singer-songwriter Bruce Cockburn composed several songs for this film including Goin’ Down the Road and Another Victim of the Rainbow. Here, as an emotional counterpoint to Fillmore’s factual blogspot, is Cockburn’s Goin’ Down the Road 1970, uploaded by winbetaxp6267 on Apr 11, 2009. The clip includes scenes from the movie.

Following is an abridged version of Fillmore’s post, omitting references to government and bank technical financial analyses. To see the complete original piece, click on the linked title –

Unless people take action, Harper’s scheme will mean ‘Goin’ Down the Road’ for Maritimers by Nick Fillmore, January 18, 2012

Harper’s Health Accord ‘deal’ threatens to widen chasm between ‘have’ and ‘have not’ provinces

Nick Fillmore

By dramatically changing the health care funding formula, is Prime Minister Stephen Harper showing little concern for the future of the Maritime provinces? The Health Accord “deal” that Harper practically threw in the face of the provinces and territories this week, not only cuts health funding for all the provinces starting in four years, but threatens to further widen the growing standard-of-living chasm between  the “have” and “have not” provinces.

Premiers vow to fight back

As their meeting ended in Victoria on Tuesday, the premiers vowed they will pressure the Conservative government to change the least equitable aspects of the so-called take-it-or-leave-it “agreement”.  But what if the sometimes stubborn Harper government refuses to give much ground?

Maritimers would be big losers if Harper refuses to compromise

All citizens of the Maritimes – not just the governments – would have good reason to vehemently protest the new agreement because the provinces that would likely lose the most in the long term are Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and Prince Edward Island.  If the 2016-17 part of the agreement goes into effect, the cost of living will increase in the Maritimes, and this will be another blow to the region’s problem of too many people leaving to live elsewhere in the country.

The result will be that once again many more millions of dollars will go to the already rich western provinces compared to payments to the Maritimes. This means huge additional costs for the Maritimes and, combined with other factors, could be the straw that breaks the camel’s back in terms of more people making the tough decision to move to a more affordable part of the country.

Why Maritimers are heading West — again

A comparison of some facts about have-not Nova Scotia and have-province British Columbia indicate why thousands of people already leave the Maritimes.

    • Unemployment rate: Nova Scotia 7.8 per cent (plus thousands discouraged from being listed) British Columbia: 7 per cent. Conclusion: it’s much harder to get a job in Nova Scotia.
    • Consumer Price Index: Nova Scotia food: 135.9 B.C. food: 126  N.S. Shelter 132.2  B.C. shelter: 114.5   Overall index: Nova Scotia 124  B.C. 117.5  It is quite a bit more expensive to live in Nova Scotia.
    • Average hourly wages (mostly skilled):  N.S.: $20.57; B.C. $23.51 (Employees earn on average $3 more an hour in B.C., but live more cheaply.)

Because of these and other factors, Nova Scotia already experiences a serious exodus of people. A TD Bank report in January 2011 said that during the years 2007 to 2010, Nova Scotia’s net loss of people to other provinces was 4,640. Incidentally, during the same period, 43,568 people moved from some part of Canada to British Columbia. 

Unfortunately, with Nova Scotia having to shoulder the additional health costs in a very few short years, it is likely that many more people will be tempted to go west, leaving the province with too small a population base to develop as it would like.

Harper’s future plans would further punish Maritimes, reversing decades of equalization payments

And if this were not enough, the Harper government may want to make additional changes that would further damage the financial picture for the Maritimes. For decades federal governments spent billions-of-dollars supporting economic development in poor parts of the country in an attempt to maintain some semblance of equality of opportunity and standard of living across the country.

Harper’s right-wing ideology brings big change to Canada

But there is now a dramatic change in the attitude in Ottawa. For Stephen Harper it all comes down to, you guessed it, right-wing ideology. Tom Flanagan, a former Harper mentor, embraces the return of “classical federalism” to Canada:

In the Canadian context, the revival of classical federalism is an essential part of classical liberalism (i.e. neoliberalism), with emphasis on smaller government, lower taxes and balanced budgets. It is good news that Stephen Harper’s Conservative government is now moving incrementally toward both classical federalism and classical liberalism.

The Harper government believes that what happens in the marketplace should decide the fate of our country. So, if it is “bust” in P.E.I. when it’s “boom” in Saskatchewan, people should move west. That’s the law of the marketplace.

Will Harper fiddle with equalization payments while Maritimes burn?

The neo-liberal ideology being implemented by the Conservatives may mean they will also want to fiddle with equalization payments: money transferred to the less prosperous provincial governments “to provide their residents with public services that are reasonably comparable to those in other provinces, at reasonably comparable levels of taxation.”

Nova Scotia, one of the provinces that receives the most under the concept, will receive a transfer payment (under the Atlantic Accord) in 2011-12 of $1.268-billion – a huge amount of money for the province. Perhaps luckily for the Maritimes, the concept of transfer payments was enshrined in the Constitution in 1982, but this will not stop the Harper government from trying to compensate for the payments in one way or another.

Coming soon to Canada – a two-tier near-total market-driven economy

If Harper gets his way in bringing a near-total market-driven economy to Canada, we could very well end up with a two-tier country – one for the rich and one for the poor.

Nick Fillmore is an award-winning investigative reporter and a founder of the Canadian Association of Journalists (CAJ), Nick was a news editor and producer with the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation for more than 20 years

Fair Use Notice: This blog, Citizen Action Monitor, may contain copyrighted material that may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material, published without profit, is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues. It is published in accordance with the provisions of the 2004 Supreme Court of Canada ruling and its six principle criteria for evaluating fair dealing.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


This entry was posted on January 22, 2012 by in information counterpower, political action and tagged , , , , .
%d bloggers like this: