Occupy activists quick to mobilize hundreds then thousands to help with Sandy storm relief

Occupy organizer Catherine Yeager talks about relief efforts in NYC’s Rockaways neighborhood

No 605 Posted by fw, November 5, 2012

“You know, it’s been a whirlwind. We’ve been trying as much as possible to organize things. We’ve been putting food out as much as possible. Lots of stuff has been coming in. And I just love Rockaway, and I want it back to where it was before the storm.”Catherine Yeager

Democracy Now senior producer Mike Burke speaks with Occupy organizer Catherine Yeager in the Rockaways about Occupy Wall Street’s transformation into Occupy Sandy Relief. For access to the video and transcript at the Democracy Now website click on the linked title below. Alternatively watch the 7-minute embedded video below followed by the DN transcript with added subheadings and text highlighting.

After Sandy, Occupy Movement Re-Emerges as Relief Hub for Residents in Need, Democracy Now, November 5, 2012

TRANSCRIPT

Mike Burke – Interestingly, one of the more active relief efforts that we came across in the Rockaways was done by a group calling themselves Occupy Sandy Relief. And this is a group of—pretty much of alumni from Occupy Wall Street who started organizing really in the hours after the storm, about ways that just, you know, regular members of the community could help. And we talked to one organizer named Catherine Yeager. She lives in the Rockaways, and we talked to her outside of the—a restaurant called the Veggie Island, which had been transformed into a relief hub. And this is part of what she had to say.

CY — “I just love Rockaway, and I want it back to where it was before the storm”

Catherine Yeager – My name is Catherine Yeager. I moved down to the Rockaway in March of this last year. I am good friends with Elizabeth Gilchrist, who owns Veggie Island. I have a bungalow down on 89th Street, and I was here for the entire hurricane. You know, it’s been a whirlwind. We’ve been trying as much as possible to organize things. We’ve been putting food out as much as possible. Lots of stuff has been coming in. And I just love Rockaway, and I want it back to where it was before the storm.

Mike Burke – So what’s happening behind you right now?

“People have literally lost everything.”

Catherine Yeager – What’s happening behind me right now is basically we’re working with Sandy Relief and OWS. The people are bringing by the car loads in clothes, food, cans goods, diapers, batteries, flashlights, everything under the sun, you know, that we kind of need right now. And so, people are able to come up and sort of pick through the different things they need, be handed the things. We have warm food that we’re making all the time for people. And so, it’s really, essentially—I mean, we have cars that come in, and things are dropped off, and within 30 minutes it’s all gone. You know, I mean, it’s that desperate down here. People have literally lost everything.

Right now, the biggest issue that we need is generators, and we need pumps, because we can’t get the electricity turned back on until all of the basements are pumped out. And there’s still—if you walk Rockaway and you knock on any door, someone—every single door, someone is going to need help.

“The [ocean] water that came in is toxic”

The water that came in is toxic, OK? We had water from the beach. I watched the waves that morning. They were already incredibly dirty. The bay and the ocean met every single part of Rockaway during the storm. There was at least two feet of flooding everywhere, sometimes up to six or seven feet of flooding, depending on where you lived. Everyone’s been affected, doesn’t matter who you are, doesn’t matter where you are. Every single person’s been affected. And so, a lot of right now is getting those basements pumped out, debris getting pulled out, you know, sweeping out huge chunks of just gunk and junk, and trying to figure out where it all goes. The boardwalk is destroyed. You know, I watched the boardwalk out my window come rushing down. The water level here got up to about five feet, and the winds were almost 20 miles per hour, so it looks like the ocean coming through this entire place. I watched cars rolling down the street. I mean, it was—it was scary. And out the window, you could see the fire. You could see this huge flame of fire coming from Breezy Point. And they really—I mean, there were, I think, 80 homes lost over there—and just devastated.

So, the last couple days have been very inspiring, because we’ve had so many people coming. People are starting to realize that Rockaway was hit as bad as it was hit, and they’re coming to start helping and starting to think about us a little bit more. So, we’ll see what happens. I don’t know when we’re going to get electricity back. I don’t know. A lot of the people’s homes are heated by baseboard heaters, and it’s just—this is salt water we’re talking about. So salt water is going to kill everything, you know? Anything, any kind of tools or cars or anything that runs on these different motors or electricity, when that salt water hits it, it’s destroyed, you know?

Mike Burke – Now, how are the relief efforts that are taking place here different from what we’re seeing with FEMA and the National Guard down the street?

FEMA is handing out phone numbers and providing cellphone charging. We’re handing out everything under the sun including clean-up help.

Catherine Yeager – FEMA down the street, from what I understand, is handing out pieces of paper that tell you to call a phone number to get help. Here, you come, and you get help immediately.

We’re going to start organizing and having people come down with their—we’re encouraging people who come down and want to do manpower help, bring your own cleaning supplies. Be your own self-sufficient cleaning person, so that we can start sending you to homes, and you just knock on the door, and you can go in, and you can start cleaning. You don’t have to come here and grab cleaning supplies. You’ve got your own to go out.

Sometimes it’s so overwhelming you don’t know where to start, where to go

We’re going to start trying to put signs up at the ends of streets and do red flags, so that people can put red flags out if they do need help, so that we have a better idea of who’s doing things on their own, who’s OK, who’s not. You know what I mean? Because it’s hard. You walk around, and it’s just such devastation that you don’t even quite know where to start. And sometimes when it’s that overwhelming, you don’t quite know where to go.

FEMA is providing cellphone charging down there, but you’ve got to wait in line—I don’t know—for an hour to be able to get your cellphone plugged in, you know? Besides that, I don’t know what they’re doing. You know? I’ve seen some cleanup. There was definitely a lot of the boardwalk that’s been moved. But, you know, nothing that I would—I’m sure is happening on Wall Street or cleanup that’s happening in other parts of Manhattan, you know?

Mike Burke – Speaking of Wall Street, what is the connection with Occupy Wall Street and this relief effort?

Occupy activists have been the only ones that have really helped

Catherine Yeager – Sandy Relief—basically, you know, Occupy Wall Street were one of the main people who started immediately knowing that Rockaway was the one that was the hardest hit. I was contacted pretty much immediately from friends of mine who are in Occupy Wall Street, like Bobby and Olivia Katz, you know, who contacted me and were reaching out and saying, “We want to bring Occupy down there. We want to help with the relief effort,” you know? And it’s—they’ve been the only ones that I—that have really helped, you know what I mean? And really been able to make real, tangible things that are going on right now.

We’ve been open since 8:00 this morning. We have been giving things away all day long. People are walking away with smiles on their faces. People are able to, you know, for one night be able to not be in a totally dark room, because they’ve gotten flashlights. You know, they have warm clothes for their children. They have clean diapers, you know. They’re going to actually be able to eat tonight.

MB — Someone asked for baby food and Occupy actually had a box – but not FEMA or the National Guard

Mike Burke – I spoke to Catherine Yeager in the Rockaways on Friday outside Veggie Island, which had been transformed into this really impressive relief hub. While we were there, there were several cars that came by. They were able to ask for specific items, and then volunteers would search the building. In one case, someone asked for baby food, which is something that FEMA and the National Guard did not have down the street. And they had a box of baby food. They were able to run it out to the car and give it to them, and they drove off with the baby food.

Occupy is outperforming the Red Cross

It’s interesting. There was an article in Slate yesterday titled Is Occupy Wall Street Outperforming the Red Cross in Hurricane Relief? [To read the article, click on the title].

Fair Use Notice: This blog, Citizen Action Monitor, may contain copyrighted material that may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material, published without profit, is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues. It is published in accordance with the provisions of the 2004 Supreme Court of Canada ruling and its six principle criteria for evaluating fair dealing

American protesters discovering they don’t have the rights and freedoms they thought they had

Put up a poster and risk felony charge plus detention with $25,000 bail

No 441 Posted by fw, March 20, 2012

“The Federally Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011, known as H.R. 347, is a law most Americans don’t know about. But you don’t have to do a lot to feel its force.”Maria Portnaya

New York City police are investigating death threats made against staff through the phone and on twitter. This after officers forcibly arrested more than 70 people during an Occupy Wall Street protest. Since the start of the movement, nationwide protests have faced numerous cases of police brutality with batons and tear gas often used to disperse crowds. As the movement continues, so, too, does Washington’s desire to silence the American public, as RT’s Marina Portnaya explains. My Transcript follows this 3:51-minute video.

Outlaw Occupy: US Set to Strangle Protests with Jail Threats, RT TV Network, March 19, 2012

TRANSCRIPT

RT News Announcer — New York City police are investigating death threats made against them by phone calls and over Twitter. This, after officers forcibly arrested more than 70 people during the latest occupy Wall Street protest. Since the start of the protests [in September 2011], nationwide protests have faced numerous cases of police crackdowns with batons and teargas often used to break up crowds. As the movement continues, so does Washington’s desire to silence the US public according to RT’s Maria Portnaya in this report.

Maria Portnaya — It’s a country that extols the virtues of liberty like no other. Since September some 6,700 Americans protesting against economic inequality and corporate greed have been arrested and silenced. A police offensive aimed at crushing Occupy Wall Street has succeeded in shattering America’s globally-marketed brand of freedom.

Natasha Lennard, reporter, Salon.com — What it made people realize is the kind of devastating state of our ability to be in a place of dissent in America. And how challenged that is. And how oppressed that is. I think people thought they were freer to dissent and protest until they tried to.

Maria Portnaya – In America it is a criminal offense to exercise freedom of speech at events deemed nationally significant such as presidential conventions and debates. Protesting in areas where the US president or anyone protected by the secret service, may be visiting, is considered a felony punishable with hefty fines and up to ten years in jail.

The Federally Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011, known as H.R. 347, is a law most Americans don’t know about. But you don’t have to do a lot to feel its force.

Mara Verheyden Hilliard, Director, Partnership for Civil Justice Fund — We represent the people who are charged with felony offences solely because they put up posters. They put up signs asking people to join the demonstrations and they’ve been arrested by the police, detained, held on $25,000 bail and charged with a felony.

Maria Portnaya – With NATO and G8 protest posters popping up nationwide US lawmakers are tightening up. Recent act amendments include prohibiting protests around the White House and broader language to make arrest and prosecution easier.

Katie Davison, OWS activist — I think this is a specific response to the fear that we are actually going to be effective in transforming the political landscape. 

Maria Portnaya – Katie Davison was arrested twice last year while taking part in the legal, non-violent Occupy Wall Street demos in New York.

Katie Davison, OWS activist – I feel like we’re living in an authoritarian government. Here we sort of sprinkle democratic, you know, like words all over everything as if, you know, we have all these freedoms that we actually don’t.

Maria PortnayaA new reality where it’s fear that just about any American engaging in political protest can be prosecuted.

Leah Bolger, President of Veterans for Peace — It’s an outrageous affront to civil liberties and the first amendment and I have personally been arrested several times protesting that had been misdemeanors now would be a felony. And it’s just unconscionable that the Congress passed this.

Maria Portnaya – America’s Congress, notoriously known for its bickering, ironically reached consensus when it came to clamping down on constituents. Only three elected officials voted against expanding federal restrictions on protests. While US leaders can’t resolve issues like national debt and homelessness, they’re all on the same page when it comes to how to handle all those citizens flooding the streets to demand change and accountability.

RELATED LINK

Fair Use Notice: This blog, Citizen Action Monitor, may contain copyrighted material that may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material, published without profit, is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues. It is published in accordance with the provisions of the 2004 Supreme Court of Canada ruling and its six principle criteria for evaluating fair dealing.

OWS: “We are the 99 percent.” Shouldn’t that be “We are the 70 percent”?

No 438 Posted by fw, March 17, 2012

“Occupy Wall Street is a leaderless resistance movement with people of many colors, genders and political persuasions. The one thing we all have in common is that We Are The 99% that will no longer tolerate the greed and corruption of the 1%.”Occupy Wall Street

“We are the 99 percent. We are getting kicked out of our homes. We are forced to choose between groceries and rent. We are denied quality medical care. We are suffering from environmental pollution. We are working long hours for little pay and no rights, if we’re working at all. We are getting nothing while the other 1 percent is getting everything. We are the 99 percent.”We are the 99 percent

The one thing we all have in common is that We Are The 99% that will no longer tolerate the greed and corruption of the 1%.” This bold assertion, which appears on Occupy Wall Street’s home page, has been nagging me for some time because, as I explain below, the numbers simply do not hold up under scrutiny.

Sure, I can appreciate the catchy and symbolic significance of 99% and 1%. Nevertheless, – and maybe I’m not the first one to say this — I’m uneasy about associating a factually inaccurate motto with a potentially game-changing movement.

Here’s how I figure it.

First, asserting that 99 percent of Americans are “getting kicked out of our homes”, being “forced to choose between groceries and rent”, “denied quality medical care”, “suffering from environmental pollution”, working long hours for little pay and no rights, if we’re working at all”, and “are getting nothing while the other 1 percent is getting everything”, is, to say the least, a gross exaggeration.

In fact, according to 2009 U.S. census figures, out of a total population of those 20 years old and over of about 223,587,000 million, upwards of 30% of those (about 67, 076,100 million) are living in households with annual money incomes of $75,000 or greater. And almost 12% of these (about 8,049,132 million) are in households with annual incomes in the range of $100,000 to $149,999.

Therefore, would it not be more factually accurate to say “We are the 70 percent”? We are the 156,519,500 million living in households with an annual income of less than $75,000 who may be more likely to be among those being deprived in one way or another?

But then, I’m Canadian. Perhaps factual accuracy is less of a concern south of the border.

Second, it occurred to me that the population figures cited above have implications for Occupy’s movement building efforts. Consider this. Let’s say, for the sake of argument, that a really successful, nation-wide campaign rally held in Washington DC attracted 500,000 people. In fact, that large turnout would represent less than 1 percent of the population aged 20 and older – to be specific 0.22%. Once more for emphasis: it would appear that only a small fraction of the US adult population might show up for a really big demonstration. 

Moreover, if we were to remove from our calculations the estimated 30% with household incomes $75,000 or greater (about 67,076,100 million out of the 223,587,000 million who were 20 or older), then the pool of people who might respond to a really big rally would probably be closer to 156,510,900 million. And even if Occupy were still able to attract 500,000 people from this reduced pool, it would still only represent 0.32% of the population.

Which raises the inevitable question – If only a tiny fraction of the American adult population would likely show up for a really big rally, how probable is it that Occupy will be able to grow the movement if it is drawing from such a small pool — less than 0.32% — of potential followers?

Or to put it more crudely, how do you get the bums out of their seats and onto the streets?

Or am I missing the point entirely?

BTW, math was not one of my best subjects so it would be prudent to verify my calculations. For that reason, here are the sources of my data –

Data Sources:

SORT OF RELATED