What deters us from acting on the climate change crisis?

We are more likely to yield to short-term pleasures than act in long-term self-interests

No 659 Posted by fw, January 21, 2013

“If you’ve ever seen a person purchase a pack of cigarettes featuring an image of a blackened, cancerous lung, then you probably understand that big issues like global warming may never be solved. The cause of inaction: an inability to stop future dangers for want of short-term pleasures. Pleasure almost always trumps long-term self-interest.”Harvey Young

The above passage is the lead-in to a piece by Harvey Young, cultural historian and Associate Professor at Northwestern University. His article, with my added subheadings and highlighted text, is posted below. Alternatively, read his original account be clicking on the following linked title.

Why we won’t stop global warming by Harvey Young, Aljazeera, January 20, 2013

We see the evidence, we hear the warnings but we don’t act. How come?

Harvey Young

Harvey Young

Unless our short- and long-term interests align, it’s unlikely that we’ll ever do anything about climate change.

If you’ve ever seen a person purchase a pack of cigarettes featuring an image of a blackened, cancerous lung, then you probably understand that big issues like global warming may never be solved. The cause of inaction: an inability to stop future dangers for want of short-term pleasures. Pleasure almost always trumps long-term self-interest.

It is difficult to contest the fact of rising temperatures and their volatile effects. The oceans are a bit warmer. Polar ice is melting at a faster rate each year. There’s less snow on certain mountains. The evidence is everywhere.

Among those who recognize the realities of global warming and climate volatility, some dismiss them as part of the Earth’s natural temperature cycle. As we’ve learned from school textbooks, science fiction novels, and even children’s television cartoons such as Dinosaur Train, our world used to be a lot warmer. The extra heat then was and, perhaps, now is simply a part of our planet’s normal climate cycle. Call it the divine plan of Mother Nature.

Others urge us to acknowledge that we are the cause or, at least, the accelerants of the Earth’s heating cycle. We pollute the air, the land, the seas and then we shrug when asked to identify the causes of climate change. Just hop on a plane to any major industrial city and you’ll see that we’re not entirely without fault as you descend through a layer of rust-coloured smog.

There is no consensus, not even among environmentalists, on whether global warming can be stopped. However, there is agreement that the levels of pollutants released can be reduced and a widespread belief that the resulting decrease could create climate stability.

We can lessen our future impact on the environment. Certainly, nations need to agree to reduce the amount of pollutants that they emit. There’s also a role for each of us to play. Recycling, planting trees, reducing our energy consumption, and carpooling are just a few of the available options.

Unfortunately, it is unlikely that the majority of us will apply ourselves to this cause. Here’s why.

Motivating us to act now is hard when the consequences are not immediate and personal

It is extraordinarily difficult to find the motivation to act now to prevent something that possibly, maybe, just might occur 100, 250, or 1,000 years from now. Although the effects of global warming can be felt today – an increasing frequency of hurricanes, heat waves and droughts, the truly spectacular consequences such as the rising of the oceans to the point that they envelop islands or droughts that transform farmlands into permanent deserts are unlikely to occur in this millennium. When the consequences of global warming are so far beyond the horizon, there seems to be little incentive to act.

Efforts to get us to think about preserving earth for our descendants rarely succeed

Even efforts to try to encourage people to preserve the world for their descendants, their children’s children’s children rarely succeed. Our sense of time spans two generations back in the past and two generations forward into the future. That’s it. Most people cannot name a single great-grandparent. Few parents can conceive of the possibility of their child someday becoming a grandparent. It’s our historical and future-looking myopia that makes it pretty much impossible to for us to even imagine the distant future.

Those of us living in a cold, winter climate welcome a little more warming

Also, let’s admit that some of the short-term effects of global warming can be outright pleasant. In my hometown, Buffalo, New York, a city notorious for blizzards and winter storms, last week the temperatures briefly climbed high enough that residents could leave their coats at home for a few days. The ability to play golf rather than shovel snow in January can make climate volatility seem more like a gift than a curse.

Too often we give in to temptation rather than acting in our long-term best interests

It’s human nature to struggle with temptation and to not always act in our long-term best interest. It is self-evident that many of our personal health problems and social ills – from obesity to random murders – could be eliminated or drastically reduced if people could manage to resist that urge to eat that extra slice of cheesecake or buy that assault weapon which was meant to be deployed in war zones and not in movie theatres or classrooms. Nevertheless, we indulge and bad things happen.

Emission-polluting vehicles and associated entertainment attractions are an integral part of American culture

We, especially in the US, like big cars and we like to own more than one of them. We, by the tens of thousands, go to racetracks and watch for hours as cars circle the speedway. We go to arenas, also by the thousands, to see Monster Jam events, cars and trucks outfitted with giant wheels crushing normal size vehicles. This is not a critique. These events are a lot of fun… but they also are an anathema to people who campaign against global warming since they make entertainment out of excessive fuel consumption and unnecessary carbon emissions.

We litter, don’t bother to sort and recycle trash, or use reusable bags at the grocery store

In this increasingly fast-paced world, we struggle to keep up and, for that reason, we may not be inclined to slow down in order to sort and recycle. How many times have we, in a rush, elected to throw everything in the trash even when a recycling bin stood next to the rubbish container? How many times have we requested plastic bags simply because they can make it easier to unload the car quickly after an outing to the grocery store?

Being environmentally responsible is not always convenient or habitual

It’s not that we’re anti-environment. It’s just that we think of ourselves as being too busy to be actively in favour of it. Carpooling is a great idea – but it often takes longer to travel to where you want to go. Planting a tree sounds very environmentally friendly, but how many people do you know who have actually planted a tree and, besides, who has the time to go tree planting? We could give money to a service that will hire someone to plant a tree for us somewhere in South America… but that sounds like a scam.

To get us to act in our own or in the commons long-term interests, it’s essential to address our short-term self-interests

As unlikely as it seems that people will apply themselves to this cause to create climate stability, history tells us that people will work in their long-term best interest when it aligns with their short-term self-interest. We can see examples of this today.

  • Governments often motivate its citizens to act responsibly by threatening them with fines. We buckle our seatbelts or wear helmets because those acts are mandated by law. In some cities, local governments charge to collect trash but not recycling – thus incentivizing (or penalizing) certain behaviours.
  • A desire to be seen as trendy can motivate action on a large scale. Within certain income brackets, a hybrid car, solar panels and LEED certified homes are must-haves. It’s environmentally friendly peer pressure. All the cool people are doing it.
  • Help people to see that some long-term effects of climate change are happening nearby and right now and that they need to be challenged and corrected: for example, the devastation left in the wake of increasingly frequent hurricanes, respiratory problems caused by the combination of high heat and smog, the pollution of well water, and more.
  • It may be difficult to imagine the world in which your children’s children’s children might live but it’s pretty obvious that there’s a problem when you (and your child) can’t go outside because of poor air quality and can’t swim in the local lake or river because of elevated bacteria levels.  
  • If a person can be convinced that acting in the long-term interests of others will immediately improve their lot, then they probably will do so. Therefore, rather than appealing to a person’s good nature and sense of moral responsibility, the campaign to slow down global warming and bring about climate stability might be better served to appeal to their baser instincts.

Harvey Young is an Associate Professor at Northwestern University and a Fellow at the Charles Warren Center for Studies in American History at Harvard University. A cultural historian, he is the author of Embodying Black Experience: Stillness, Critical Memory and the Black Body.

Fair Use Notice: This blog, Citizen Action Monitor, may contain copyrighted material that may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material, published without profit, is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues. It is published in accordance with the provisions of the 2004 Supreme Court of Canada ruling and its six principle criteria for evaluating fair dealing

Talking Climate: The gateway to research on climate change communication

At Talking Climate, the best research evid­ence is trans­lated into prac­tical guides on a wide range of topics

No 503 Posted by fw, June 11, 2012

Talking Climate: The gateway to research on climate change communication

About & Contact

There is a great deal of research on cli­mate change com­mu­nic­a­tion. But too often this valu­able know­ledge doesn’t reach the people who need it most: cli­mate change com­mu­nic­ators. At the same time, researchers are often unaware of how to pro­mote their work beyond aca­demic journals.

At Talking Climate, the best research evid­ence is trans­lated into prac­tical guides on a wide range of topics, ensuring aca­demics and prac­ti­tioners get the most from cli­mate change com­mu­nic­a­tion research.

With a com­pre­hensive and fre­quently updated data­base of aca­demic papers, a reg­ular news­letter, and a blog fea­turing com­ment and ana­lysis from cli­mate change com­mu­nic­a­tion experts, Talking Climate is the gateway to research on cli­mate change communication.

Talking Climate is a UK-based part­ner­ship between the Climate Outreach and Information Network(COIN), the Public Interest Research Centre (PIRC), the Understanding Risk group at Cardiff University and the ‘Climate change as com­plex social issue’ research group at the School of Sociology and Social Policy, Nottingham University.

Design, devel­op­ment and main­ten­ance of this web­site was funded by Nottingham University School of Sociology and Social Policy, and the cre­ation and devel­op­ment of the data­base was funded by the Understanding Risk group at Cardiff University – spe­cific­ally Nick Pidgeon’s Climate Leader Professorial Fellowship from the Economic and Social Research Council.

Our US and Canadian partner in cli­mate change com­mu­nic­a­tion is Climate Access - the net­work for those enga­ging the public in the trans­form­a­tion to low-carbon, resi­lient communities.

 OVERVIEW

Communicating climate science

The body of sci­entific evid­ence showing that the cli­mate is chan­ging due to human activity is so over­whelming that you might expect the facts to speak for them­selves. Unfortunately they do not, as some people still do not accept the reality or ser­i­ous­ness of cli­mate change. This means that using the most effective methods of com­mu­nic­ating cli­mate sci­ence is critical.

One chal­lenge for com­mu­nic­ators is that cli­mate sci­ence – like any other sci­entific dis­cip­line – will always con­tain uncer­tain­ties. Being honest and open about what sci­ent­ists do and don’t know about cli­mate change, without under­mining the strength of your mes­sage, is a real bal­an­cing act. Talking Climate con­tains a guide to com­mu­nic­ating uncer­tainty, a sec­tion focusing spe­cific­ally on com­mu­nic­ating uncer­tainty in IPCC reports, and links to other resources that offer advice on com­mu­nic­ating uncer­tainty in cli­mate sci­ence in the most effective way.

Another reason that cli­mate sci­ence is so dif­fi­cult to com­mu­nicate is that it is com­plex, and often involves tech­nical ter­min­o­logy and jargon. This guide con­tains advice on making cli­mate sci­ence simple – the best and clearest lan­guage to get com­plex sci­entific con­cepts across in an under­stand­able way.

While com­mu­nic­ating the sci­ence of cli­mate change is an essen­tial com­ponent of cli­mate change com­mu­nic­a­tion, there is mounting evid­ence that simply turning up the volume on the sci­entific facts and fig­ures is not enough to get more people inter­ested and engaged in cli­mate change. Scepticism about the reality and ser­i­ous­ness of cli­mate change is often not based on a lack of sci­entific know­ledge. This guide sum­mar­ises the social sci­ence research that is revealing why some people remain scep­tical about cli­mate change des­pite the strength of the sci­entific evid­ence. Talking Climate also offers a roundup of the key mes­sages about public atti­tudes towards cli­mate change – essen­tial to under­stand for over­coming scepticism.

GUIDES

Fair Use Notice: This blog, Citizen Action Monitor, may contain copyrighted material that may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material, published without profit, is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues. It is published in accordance with the provisions of the 2004 Supreme Court of Canada ruling and its six principle criteria for evaluating fair dealing.

 

“Counterpower” by Tim Gee — Pt 2: How Idea Counterpower helps movements win

No 380 Posted by fw, December 27, 2011

Just to recap – This series, based on Tim Gee’s Counterpower: Making Change Happen, really began with a review of his book. The review led to a purchase. And a cursory skim of the contents convinced me the book warranted this series. Part 1 presented a selection of highlights and main ideas from the Introduction, focusing on what prompted Gee to write the book, the four stages of development of successful populist campaigns, the three types of Counterpower that people can use to remove or neutralize the power of elites — Idea Counterpower, Economic Counterpower, and Physical Counterpower — and how Counterpower strategies and tactics have evolved over time.

Following the series’ format, this post, Part 2, encapsulates highlights and main ideas of Idea Counterpower, excerpted from Chapter 1, How Counterpower helps movements win.

Idea Counterpower

Gee introduces the Chapter with this quotation –

“Freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed.”Martin Luther King Jr

Those with power rarely yield it voluntarily. But the lesson from the past is that “for every aspect of power wielded by the “haves”, the “have-nots” can wield more.Counterpower, the ability of the powerless to remove or neutralize the power of the powerful, is the game-changer.

Here are a few examples of past Counterpower successes –

  • The working class won the extension of the ballot
  • Disenfranchised women achieved universal adult suffrage
  • Organized labor won workplace rights and universal public services
  • Among others, Americans, Irish, Indigenous peoples, and Africans won independence from colonial rule
  • Subjugated peoples have won their freedom from puppet dictatorships

Given that well-organized populist campaigns can win concessions from, and even overthrow, oppressive powerful regimes, Gee raises two incisive questions, which his book seeks to answer:

  • How can we win more campaigns? 
  • And why do we not win more often?

His quest for answers begins with an analysis of the nature of power:

  • power of control by the few over the many; and 
  • Counterpower of the many to resist the control by the few.

Corporate and government elites have a hidden advantage in the sense that their position of power is accepted by law-abiding citizens as the social norm. But over and above this, powerful elites exercise ‘idea power’, ‘economic power’, and ‘physical power’, which activists must confront with Counterpower.

The power of elites can be transformed into Counterpower though well-organized, popular resistance. Gee boldly claims:

If we can find ways to use these to undermine the power of the haves, then we are more powerful than they could possibly imagine.

To find these “ways”, he looks to the past to find examples of how these three types of power and Counterpower have been used.

Idea Counterpower

According to Gee, powerful elites manufacture a façade of “philosophical legitimacy” to normalize their worldview. In response to elitist worldviews, past social movements have commonly employed their own innovative brand of Idea Counterpower. The most effective populist campaigns don’t just inform, they inspire.

Gee draws from history to provide these examples of Idea Counterpower –

  • In the struggle for the abolition of the slave trade, U.S. and British abolitionists printed an iconic image of a chained slave on his knees on consumer goods designed for radically chic white consumers: the iconic image was captioned — “Am I not a man and a brother?” Now that’s effective communication — powerful image + a few well-chosen words + targeted audience.
  • In Things Fall Apart, the most widely read book in modern African literature, Nigeria novelist Chinua Achebe explains colonization from an African perspective, which derides the colonists’ portrayal of Igbo culture. The book won global praise, inspired Africans, and challenged European misconceptions of Africa as a land of savages.
  • Music is another vehicle for the transmission of Counterpower messages.  For example, “The Singing Revolutions” of 1980’s democracy campaigns in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania served as a “powerful statement of national identify and belonging.”
  • Changing the consciousness of the world with media mind-bombs. Greenpeace cofounder Bob Hunter’s innovative contribution to Idea Counterpower was “to produce media-friendly images capable not only of drawing attention to certain issues and events, but of changing the consciousness of the world.”
  • Burmese activists devised a clever way to elude the repressive military regime’s media censorship. They submitted to the state-controlled Myanmar Times a phony ad from a phony travel agency named ‘Ewhsnahtrellik’. The nonsensical ad read: “Feel Relaxed, Enjoy Everything, Dance On Minutes”. But by stringing together the first letter of each word readers got the message – FREEDOM. And reversing the letters of the travel agency’s name yields “Killer Than Shwe”, the name of a leading military general. Ingenious use of Idea Counterpower.

Gee emphasizes –

Idea Counterpower means so much more than simply talking to people. Yet too often, campaigns use only the most pedestrian tactics.

In the next sentence, he segues into Economic Counterpower, which will be the focus of Part 3:

Even those that go beyond the conventional methods still often restrict themselves to Idea Counterpower alone. . . . Other forms of Counterpower are needed to force recalcitrant targets to change. One such option is Economic Counterpower.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This blog, Citizen Action Monitor, may contain copyrighted material that may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material, published without profit, is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues. It is published in accordance with the provisions of the 2004 Supreme Court of Canada ruling and its six principle criteria for evaluating fair dealing