No 267 Posted by fw, September 4, 2011
“When he argued that capitalism would plunge the middle classes into something like the precarious existence of the hard-pressed workers of his time, Marx anticipated a change in the way we live that we’re only now struggling to cope with. . . . Capitalism has been described as a process of creative destruction, and no one can deny that it’s been prodigiously productive. Practically anyone who is alive in Britain today has a higher real income than they would have had had capitalism never existed. The trouble is that among the things that have been destroyed in the process is the way of life on which capitalism in the past depended.” John Gray
The celebrated British political philosopher John Gray returns to this blog to deliver a hard-hitting talk about capitalism. You can listen to the original 10-minute show on the program’s BBC’s website, A Point of View, or, if it is no longer available there, try the show’s podcast page. My transcript of Gray’s presentation follows, with added subheadings.
The Revolution of Capitalism by John Gray, BBC Radio 4, September 2 and September 4, 2011
As the financial crisis deepens, more people think Karl Marx was right – capitalism is on a self-destructive path
As a side effect of the financial crisis more and more people are starting to think Karl Marx was right. The great 19th century German philosopher, economist and revolutionary believed that capitalism was radically unstable. It had a built-in tendency to produce ever larger booms and busts, and over the longer term it was bound to destroy itself. Marx welcomed capitalism’s self-destruction. He was confident that a popular revolution would occur and bring a communist system into being that would be more productive and far more humane.
And in the process, it’s destroying the middle-class way of life
Marx was wrong about communism. Where he was prophetically right was in his grasp of the revolution of capitalism. It’s not just capitalism’s endemic instability that he understood, though in this regard he was far more perceptive than most economists in his day and ours. More profoundly, Marx understood how capitalism destroys its own social base – the middle-class way of life.
The Marxist terminology of ‘bourgeois’ and ‘proletarian’ has an archaic ring. But when he argued that capitalism would plunge the middle classes into something like the precarious existence of the hard-pressed workers of his time, Marx anticipated a change in the way we live that we’re only now struggling to cope with.
Capitalism — a process of “creative destruction” of everything in its path
He viewed capitalism as the most revolutionary economic system in history. And there can be no doubt that it differs radically from those of previous times. Hunter-gatherers persisted in their way of life for thousands of years, slave cultures for almost as long and feudal societies for many centuries. In contrast, capitalism transforms everything it touches. It’s not just brands that are constantly changing. Companies and industries are created and destroyed in an incessant stream of innovation, while human relationships are dissolved and reinvented in novel forms.
Capitalism has been described as a process of creative destruction, and no one can deny that it’s been prodigiously productive. Practically anyone who is alive in Britain today has a higher real income than they would have had had capitalism never existed. The trouble is that among the things that have been destroyed in the process is the way of life on which capitalism in the past depended.
Life is good in capitalist societies – until the markets fall in recessionary times
Defenders of capitalism argue that it offers to everyone the benefits that in Marx’s time were enjoyed only by the bourgeoisie, the settled middle class that owned capital and had a reasonable level of security and freedom in their lives. In 19th century capitalism, most people had nothing. They lived by selling their labour. And when markets turned down they faced hard times.
But as capitalism evolves, its defenders say, increasing numbers of people will be able to benefit from it. Fulfilling careers will no longer be the prerogative of a few. No more will people struggle from month to month to live on an insecure wage. Protected by savings, a house they own and a decent pension, they’ll be able to plan their lives without fear. With the growth of democracy and the spread of wealth no one need be shut out from the bourgeois life. Everybody can be middle class.
But capitalism has failed to deliver on promises of the “good life” for workers over the past 30 years
In fact, in Britain, the US and many other developed countries over the past 20 or 30 years, the opposite has been happening. Job security doesn’t exist, the trades and professions of the past have largely gone and life-long careers are barely memories. If people have any wealth, it’s in their houses. But house prices don’t always increase. When credit is tight, as it is now, they can be stagnant for years.
A dwindling minority can count on a pension on which they could comfortably live. Not many have significant savings. More and more people live from day to day with little idea of what the future may bring. Middle-class people used to think their lives unfolded in an orderly progression, but it’s no longer possible to look at life as a succession of stages in which each is a step up from the last.
In the process of creative destruction, the ladder has been kicked away and for increasing numbers of people a middle-class existence is no longer even an aspiration. As capitalism has advanced it returned most people to a new version of the precarious existence of Marx’s proles [proletarians]. Our incomes are far higher and in some degree we’re cushioned against shocks by what remains of the post-war welfare state. But we’ve very little effective control over the course of our lives, and the uncertainty in which we must live is being worsened by policies devised to deal with the financial crisis. Zero interest rates alongside rising prices means you’re getting a negative return on your money and over time your capital is being eroded.
The situation of many younger people is even worse. In order to acquire the skills you need you have to go into debt. Since at some point you’ll have to retrain you should try to save. But if you’re indebted from the start that’s the last thing you’ll be able to do. Whatever their age the prospect facing most people today is a lifetime of insecurity.
At the same time as it has stripped people of the security of bourgeois life, capitalism has made the type of person who lived the bourgeois life obsolete. In the ‘80s there was much talk of Victorian values, and promoters of the free market used to argue that it would bring us back to the wholesome virtues of the past. For many – women and the poor, for example – these Victorian values could be pretty stultifying in their effects.
The free market actually undermines the virtues of the middle-class way of life by rewarding instead those who are forced to continuously reinvent themselves
But the larger fact is that the free market works to undermine the virtues that maintain the bourgeois life. When savings are melting away being thrifty can be the road to ruin. It’s the person who borrows heavily and isn’t afraid to declare bankruptcy that survives and goes on to prosper.
When the labour market is so highly mobile, it’s not those who stick dutifully to their task that succeed; it’s people who are always ready to try something new that looks more promising. In a society that’s being continuously transformed by market forces, traditional values are dysfunctional, and anyone who tries to live by them risks ending up on the scrap heap.
Looking to a future in which the market permeates every corner of life, Marx wrote in The Communist Manifesto, “Everything that is solid melts into air.” For someone living in early Victorian England – the Manifesto was published in 1848 – it was an astonishingly far-seeing observation. At the time nothing seemed more solid than the society on the margins of which Marx lived.
Today, only a “tiny few” have accumulated vast wealth
A century and a half later we find ourselves in the world he anticipated where everyone’s life is experimental and provisional and sudden ruin can happen at any time. A tiny few have accumulated vast wealth but even that has an evanescent almost ghostly quality. In Victorian times, the seriously rich could afford to relax provided they were conservative in how they invested their money. When the heroes of Dickens’ novels finally come into their inheritance they do nothing forever after.
“Today there’s no haven of security.” We’re trapped in a state of “perpetual unrest”
Today there’s no haven of security. The gyrations of the market are such that no one can know what will have value even a few years ahead. This state of perpetual unrest is the permanent revolution of capitalism, and I think it’s going to be with us in any future that’s realistically imaginable.
The worst is yet to come
We’re only part of the way through a financial crisis that will turn many more things upside down. Currencies and governments are likely to go under along with parts of the financial system we believe to have been made safe. The risks that threaten to freeze the world economy only three years ago haven’t been dealt with. They have simply been shifted to states.
Whatever politicians may tell us about the need to curb the deficit, debts on the scale that have been run up can’t be repaid. Almost certainly they will be inflated away, a process that’s bound to be painful and impoverishing for many. The result can only be further upheaval on an even bigger scale.
Marx was wrong: Communism didn’t destroy bourgeois life – capitalism did
But it won’t be the end of the world or even of capitalism. Whatever happens we’re still going to live with the mercurial energy that the market has released. Capitalism has led to a revolution but not the one Marx expected. The fiery German thinker hated the bourgeois life and looked to communisms to destroy it. And just as he predicted, the bourgeois world has been destroyed. But it wasn’t communism that did the deed. It’s capitalism that’s killed off the bourgeoisie. [Note: The term bourgeoisie has been widely used as an approximate equivalent of upper class under capitalism. The word also evolved to mean merchants and traders, and until the 19th century was mostly synonymous with the middle class]
- Global economic forecast dire, no viable pushback from the left In an interview with Paul Jay of The Real News Network (TRNN), Co-director of the Political Economy Research Institute (PERI) and Professor of Economics, Gerald Epstein, comments on Nouriel Roubini’s, Aug 15, 2011, Project Syndicate article, Is Capitalism Doomed?